• casmael@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Meh I think they might be overestimating their market position if that’s the strategy

    • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      More than you think. They are also actively seeking ways to make that leverage effect more people.

      They are defining web standards. They control chrome and chromium. So all of the alternative browsers that aren’t safari and Firefox are using Google’s web engine. Even Firefox and safari are beholden to Google as they fund both these web browsers through their default search deals.

      Google after many failed messaging apps has taken on RCS messaging. They provide most of the supporting infrastructure through their Jibe servers. They don’t allow anyone but themselves and Samsung to make an RCS app on android. They also had a campaign to pressure apple to use RCS. It’s likely apple’s RCS will be following Google’s Jibe service closely, as they’ve already said their will work with Google on this. Google successfully got most RCS messages going through their servers, with apple on board with RCS itll see most SMS messages defaulting to RCS and most of those going through Google.

      They also have deep hooks into education market with their OneDrive/Google docs products and Chromebooks.

      Most privacy focused android alternatives recommend Google hardware.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    How is this even legal? So now suddenly every chromium extension has to go through a play store style review? How is Google entitled to do this on their competitor’s browsers?

  • Swarfega@lemm.ee
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    What happened to the ad blocker detection thing a month ago. Did Google remove it or does uBlock Origin have a permanent workaround now rather than needing to clear cache and reload?

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It’s still an ongoing war, but with Manifest V3, Google will have an advantage over adblockers because they will be in full control over the frequency of extension updates, how many ad blocking rulesets they’ll allow, and perhaps when no one is looking, prevents those rulesets from targeting their own domains. The latter is the nuclear option that’ll instantly piss off the whole tech world if implemented now, but perhaps slow boiled frogs won’t notice it once the heat is high enough.

  • HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    How is it still a problem for anyone? I haven’t used Google in years and I am unexpectedly still alive

    • Vent@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Google is disallowing “remote code” in extensions and classifying blocklists (the lists of urls that ad blockers use to know what to block, which are just text files hosted on remote servers like github) as remote code. As a result, any blocklist updates will need to go through the extension review process, which typically takes anywhere from a few hours to a few weeks.

      Google often updates YouTube’s ad delivery on a daily basis. Blocklists must also update as frequently to keep ads blocked on YT. If Google requires that blocklists go through the review process, they can drag their feet and essentially render the ad blockers useless even if they have to allow them to stay in the extension store.