• xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    133
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Nothing could possibly benefit that company as much as Elon Musk getting demotivated and no longer coming in to work.

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      5 months ago

      Tesla getting a new CEO is the only way Tesla is going to win back the demographics that Musk chased away acting like a dumb toddler.

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        ie: the people who care about climate change enough to spend $40-100K on EVs of mediocre build quality.

        I suppose his maliciously designed Truck will convert a few bro-dozers who need a new truck to commute in, but I don’t think it’ll help Teslas bottom line.

    • Skeezix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t think you understand just how upset he’s going to be if he doesn’t get 46 billion.

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      If the stock wasn’t so overly valued based on Musk-lies I’d agree, but I think they’re in trouble either way.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          My money out on a major state banning the cyber truck after it Julians a pedestrian.

          I know that a normal car with sharp protruding bodywork/rust holes, wouldn’t pass the safety inspection in at least the 2 New England states I’ve owned cars in.

          I could see CA and the rest of the west coast banning their sales first, or requiring so much rework that they aren’t viable cars there.

  • unmagical@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    5 months ago

    Grab 5 of the top engineers, sales people, and marketing at the company, double their pay, and grant them a $1,000,000,000 bonus in 5 years time if they beat certain performance metrics. Have them sit on a board as coCEOs and watch true motivation. Kick out the guy that’s demanding 3 times your annual income as “motivational” compensation.

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    5 months ago

    I remember when Bill Gates was the richest person on the planet with $45 billion total and it was covered in all the news. Things have gone more out of control than anyone could’ve imagined.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t even get out of bed for less than $2 billion.

    How the hell can this not affect the morale of people working for this company? Even from a purely evil self-preservation standpoint that seems important to consider.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 months ago

      My company sold a part of our business, and I casually mentioned to our VP that it’s almost enough to buy everyone in the company a lamborghini. He didn’t seem to think that would be a good idea, but that stock buybacks and a big dividend would be…

    • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      can this not affect the morale of people working for this company?

      Are you saying they WON’T give 46 billion to everybody who works for this company?

      How scandalous!

  • ryper@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    5 months ago

    Here’s the article; the link in the OP points to a discussion thread.

    The chair ought to be questioning whether the company should continue to employ someone who needs that much “motivation”, not urging shareholders to give it to him.

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 months ago

    Tesla Board Chairperson Robyn Denholm urged shareholders to re-approve CEO Elon Musk’s $46 billion pay package this week, saying the vote is “not about the money” while suggesting that Musk could leave Tesla or devote less time to the company if he isn’t properly compensated.

    Don’t threaten me with a good time!

  • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 months ago

    So basically, he wants his salary to be Twitter’s purchase price and some change. That seems totally reasonable as compensation.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s funny that he’s asking for what amounts to an undo button for this colossal mistake he made in buying Twitter.

      “Please give me exactly enough cash to bail myself out of all this Saudi debt that I took on when I memed myself into a legal requirement to acquire Twitter”

      I hope this gets him booted from Tesla. It’s an open secret that he doesn’t run the show anyway, he just has enough power to force them to develop boondoggles like the Cybertruck.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’ll happily be their new CEO for a mere half a billion. I will be intensely motivated as such.

    Seriously though, how can you pay a CEO this much money and actually believe that’s how much value you’re getting? Absolutely ridiculous. I imagine it’s a revolving door system where you and your buddies always vote each other up into bigger compensation packages.

  • cor@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 months ago

    if he wasn’t motivated to not tank tesla’s stock by being a vocal fascist… i don’t think this would motivate him to do anything good either