The legal ruling against the Internet Archive has come down in favour of the rights of authors.

    • Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wonder if you would feel that way if you were one of the artists whose copyrighted media was distributed illegally?

      • auth@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The problem is that copyright last way to fucking long and they keep extending it. It should be the same as patents… 15 years I think. I’m just going to keep xdcc get whatever I want until they fix it.

        • Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree, but the internet archive doesn’t have the authority to roll the duration back right? So it was illegal. We all agree the law needs to change, but it is still the law currently.

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is an affront on preservation of human knowledge and keeping it accessible. This is a perfect example of what utter cancer copyright is.

  • taanegl@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Aaaw. Publishers caring about authors? That’s a big fat lie. Make no mistake, no matter what type of publisher, be it literary, musical, dramatic (TV & film), the only goal is to consolidate ingellectual property, employ predatory and lobsided contracts and then pretend that they represent the creators.

    Fact is that lending, and also digital lending, has a negligible result on the author’s bottom line. The publishers however want libraries gone because then they make their investors happy. That’s it.

    Know the motivation and intention behind this, because it isn’t to protect the income of authors.