![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
You are young and blissfully naive. Sec being included with development is a recent thing
You are young and blissfully naive. Sec being included with development is a recent thing
Good, fuck call centers. Make sure the societal benefit is captured via tax
Botw and sequel are critically acclaimed across the board.
The US saying how free it is compares to a small guy telling you how much of an alpha male he is. Unreliable narration
Let’s see if any Lemmy users are able to correctly identify why this is happening. Bonus points for American-Style ignorance
Movie studios pay unimaginable money to learn what people want. It is a constant, year round expenditure for them. Their information and data suggests that while a vocal minority may be fed up with remakes, people still fervently buy them, have very short memories and seem to go bananas for any shred of nostalgia bait.
Remakes are as a result an incredibly safe bet, they are less expensive and less risk, which in financial terms is a green light. Until they aren’t either of those things and they carry more risk, they will continue to be pedalled out.
Foreign policy
Holy shit that website I can’t close the cookie prompt
Oh please, another hapa with an identity crisis
Well he is a politician, so its fairly likely this is something politicial…
I’m surprised you genuinely believe this. Western sensibilities absolutely value this centrally.
I’ve no doubt that twitters banning system is a steaming pile, it has a long history of being terrible. Doesn’t change my point.
It literally says in the preview and the article it was restored quickly. There are a myriad of reasons she could have been banned.
I doubt Elon is sitting there with his dick out waiting to ban her, despite what most people here seem to believe?
You have drawn an incorrect conclusion about the specifics of the social mechanics and cited it as “from your experience” after presenting it as fact.
You could simply have a poor grasp of social mechanics, or be misinformed, misunderstood the original premise but ultimately it doesn’t really matter.
You implied lack of conformity and participation is not a cause of bullying - it absolutely is, its probably the original cause of most bullying.
You have completely misunderstood this and are trying to overlay some bizarre Andrew Tate-esque psychobabble to explain your misunderstanding.
You did the right thing. If it was the 1900s and everyone else was to give their child cigarettes, they might get bullied for having no cigarettes, but you know what is best and you stuck with it
Ubuntu server is fine relax
Awesome plot basis
This question is such a depressing example of Bay-Area inhumanity. God Bless America
Buy a mac or support steamOS adoption or just get a linux distro. This will drive the improvement of nontechnical consumer GNU/Linux