Do you think it’s normal for people to be downvoted so hard just for giving their opinion? It’s not even a controversial one, just debatable. This is part of Lemmy that I find to be worse than Reddit, and it sucks to see it everytime.
Do you think it’s normal for people to be downvoted so hard just for giving their opinion? It’s not even a controversial one, just debatable. This is part of Lemmy that I find to be worse than Reddit, and it sucks to see it everytime.
What’s so cancer about it?
Who just found that out?
It can always get worse.
Nah, it’s something you’re lucky enough to learn coincidentally or you don’t. And if you found out too late in life, you might be too stubborn to learn it at that point.
The Pixel 4 has a Snapdragon 855 which does have a neural engine, which is similar to the AI engine used in AI laptops, so you’re just completely wrong there.
Windows does advertise this feature, though. It’s the only thing that would make me even want an AI laptop.
I want video live caption, so that’s one reason.
That’s the thing, I feel like this comic didn’t drag on long enough. It ended too early to tell us the full joke.
Maybe he did, but is it for the sake of changing the status quo or for vengeance and making money? I also need to rewatch it to make sure, but he sure seem like the only thing he cares about is his own family.
That’s not how it works, the meme is only pointing out the irony, not saying the Taliban is not allowed to fight back against the Islamic State.
You seem to have some trouble differentiating between making fun the Taliban vs defending the enemy of them. If I make fun of the US, that doesn’t mean I am defending China or Russia. Somehow, your head have managed to mix these two things together.
Can I chalk this up to you strongly supporting the Taliban to the point that any slight against them means it is defending their enemy?
Again, I’m asking where he defended the Islamic State like you claimed. Making fun of the Taliban is not defending their enemies.
Vulture was a victim, but he responded by selling alien tech weapons to criminals. His response has nothing to do with changing the status quo.
Can you show me where they defended the Islamic State?
Oh yeah, they did mention that clause. I guess you can still limit the power of the wireless router so it doesn’t penetrate too far outside the rooms, as well as using bands that is not as congrsted. That might be good enough to comply to the TOS, or it might not.
That might be one of the concern, but the TOS clearly doesn’t state that. They only prohibit against attaching multiple devices to the network. If you attach it to your desktop PC, it could be considered not on the network as long as you don’t bridge the two connections together.
An extra step that doesn’t go against their TOS, though.
You might be right, I’ve misread the point of the parent comment in the first place. I guess I just wasted both of our time, sorry about that.
Why do we need to differentiate those two use cases, anyway? It’s not like they differentiate between a single human or multiple humans consuming the content, or if there are non-humans also consuming it. Differentiating those two use cases is just another example of publishers wanting more money due to greed. I’m not sure why Lemmy is so supportive of that.
You completely missed the point.