• Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Obligatory, I do not condone violence per lemmys rules, or whatever.

    Agreed. This might be the only method to save us. Rule of law doesn’t work, we are owned by the billionaire class. Bring out the guillotines for these bootlickers. Might be the only way we get free.

    Free Luigi.

    Fuck this aryan Pam bondi cunt and these prosecutors.

    • CallateCoyote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oh, we’re not supposed to condone violence against monsters who hurt others for greed here either? Well, dang. What if I do though?

        • CallateCoyote@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          This should like… just not be a rule though. Why can’t we wish for violence against evil people? Who is coming after the Lemmy instances if users wish for violence against evil people? It’s not like we’re actively organizing simply by saying we like imagining healthcare CEOs having their brains removed via bullet. And boy how do I!

        • CallateCoyote@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Works for me. I’m over wasting my time on platforms where I’m not allowed to praise the great man Luigi for his wonderful deeds and wish for more like them. Because that’s how I honestly feel and I won’t apologize for it! I can’t hide who I am anymore.

          Edit: whoops. Wrong thread but same idea. Hah.

              • philpo@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Or the victim had a run in with the actual clients who now frame the left for it and kill two birds with one stone that way.

                Tinfoil hat off

    • VanillaFrosty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m still waiting for people to get mad enough to use drones for political violence. Like shit, Ukraine can make an effective FPV for like 50 USD from what I’ve seen

      Imagine if Luigi dropped a grenade on this dude while just sitting in Central Park.

      It’s gonna be a good time.

      • Jordan117@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        Drone warfare is politically agnostic. If it can be used by a Luigi against a healthcare CEO, it can be used by far-right extremists against progressive politicians, pride parades, or Black churches. I’m not very jazzed to live in the world of Slaughterbots.

        • med@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          Not to mention, the minute it happens, the government will carpet the skies with observation drones in the name of safety

          • VanillaFrosty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Maybe, but honestly there isn’t too much a need for them to thanks to the existence of things like TLO. Maybe for surveillance over less developed areas?

            Idk I’m not happy about any of this but it’s interesting to speculate what a modern day cyberpunk is going to look like.

        • VanillaFrosty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I feel with that interpretation, any weapon is politically agnostic. Which I’d agree with given the use of firearms by far right extremists to shoot up Walmarts, clubs, and churches. They’ve already been using weapons against their “adversaries” like the domestic terrorists they are.

          But agreed, I’m not actually excited about it. The premise is horrifying. I do hope the good guys pull the trigger first on this one. It’s, in my opinion, the logical next step.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I kind of hope that will have the bonus effect of making the ownership class ease up on return-to-office. Sure, have your executive meeting in-person. Oh shit, someone flew a drone in and it exploded, shooting nails everywhere and killing half the c-suite? Shit. Anyway. We’ll be working from home until at least they clear the blood out of the carpets.

        (Though realistically, they’d make workers go in physically while being remote themselves. But maybe someone will bomb their house. No mercy for the ultra-rich.)

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      Technically it’s not a rule of Lemmy but the instance rules that forbid this.

      We are indeed owned by the billionaire class. It’s their country. We live in it.

    • MochiGoesMeow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Evidently this researcher found that peaceful resistance movements have been more successful in bringing democratic governments in their nations against tyranny than violent ones that usually instilled more extreme governments.

      https://youtu.be/YJSehRlU34w