Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.ml · 10 months agoIs the Windows Subsystem for Linux worth it?message-squaremessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up135arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up129arrow-down1message-squareIs the Windows Subsystem for Linux worth it?Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.ml · 10 months agomessage-square44fedilinkfile-text
I’ve had a pretty poor experience with it myself, so I wanna see what the Linux community thinks about this.
minus-squaresnap@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down1·10 months agoFor me: totally. I need to use windows for work. With WSL, I can use all the tools I need via the Debian box underneath. All I use windows for are the communication apps my colleagues use. Apart from work: nope. Full time Linux kinda guy
minus-squareflashgnash@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-210 months agoGlad to know teams isn’t just the bane of my existence on linux
minus-squarePlexSheep@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·10 months agoTeams and outlook have both pretty good third party flatpaks.
minus-squareflashgnash@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·10 months agoFrom what I gather teams-for-linux still uses the web version doesn’t it? Would that not be subject to all the same problems?
For me: totally. I need to use windows for work. With WSL, I can use all the tools I need via the Debian box underneath. All I use windows for are the communication apps my colleagues use.
Apart from work: nope. Full time Linux kinda guy
Glad to know teams isn’t just the bane of my existence on linux
Teams and outlook have both pretty good third party flatpaks.
From what I gather teams-for-linux still uses the web version doesn’t it? Would that not be subject to all the same problems?