• Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        No its her stunt to make her job stand out and very clearly detrimental to her ability to do her job.

  • brax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Either she never read the book “Snuff” or she wanted to see if it would really happen…

  • Bunbury@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    What are the chances that one of the first 50 or so people had some kind of STD and this is just a mass-spreader event? What are the chances that she now has permanently damaged her health?

    I’m fine with sex between consenting adults as long as it happens safely. I just don’t see how this could possibly have been safe. And even if (and that’s a big “if”) all of the participants got tested beforehand, what are the chances that the next person “inspired by” her will also do this safely?

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Typically professionals do ensure all their partners are tested beforehand.

      what are the chances that the next person “inspired by” her will also do this safely?

      Puritanical hand wringing. Tons of people have unsafe sex every day. If you want to lower STI spread, create public awareness campaigns and improve sex ed for students.

      • Bunbury@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I hope you’re right about the testing. Wish it said in the article. Also more sex ed is always a good idea.

        Sadly I don’t think you’re wrong about the puritanical bit. I didn’t think I was but the idea of this many sexual partners in this short a time does make me uncomfortable. Definitely gave me something to think about and maybe uncovered some bias worth working on.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I love the euphemism that she “slept with” 583 guys. I mean that’s a lotta naps in 6 hours! Takes me at least 20 minutes to drift off.

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    OnlyFans star Annie Knight is sharing an update amid her recent hospitalization after sleeping with 583 men in six hours.

    It’s bizarre that US uses “sleeping with” to mean “had sex with”. Readers clearly understand, she uses the word “sex” in her quotes, but the magazine/site insists on using that bizarre euphemism.

    • Semperverus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      You mean to tell me that when someone says that they’re taking a shit, it shouldn’t mean literally turd burgaling?

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I don’t think that that’s very uncommon. When one “goes to the bathroom”, it’s understood that this is a euphemism for urinating or dedicating, not just hanging out there.

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Agreed. It just seems like a weird editorial decision. Maybe it’s because I’m not a regular US reader, or I live in a different country, but it seems to slightly obfuscate what happened.

        • herrvogel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          You’re looking way too deep into it. “Sleeping with someone” is such a common expression that nobody can possibly hope to obfuscate anything with it. Everybody knows they fucked. There will be no mistakes, no confusion. Besides, it’s not unusual for different contexts to use different phrases and expressions for the same thing. The press using a “softer” language is not a uniquely American thing by a long shot and it’s kinda weird to assume it would be.

          Not an American either btw.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      One fewer word/syllable.

      I think they should pare it down further though, and just say ‘fucking’

    • reiterationstation@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Jfc it’s just as bizarre as every other fucking cultures language on earth but I get it, it’s popular to shit on America while it’s fighting a civil war that was never declared. Easier than realizing this shit show is coming for you next.

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not talking about the US, I’m talking about US Magazine. I’ve seen other US publications use “sex” to refer to sex.

  • who@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Wow. I hope she recovers fully and quickly.

    583 men in six hours.

    That’s about 37 seconds each.

  • huppakee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    3 days ago

    “I don’t understand why people have such an issue with it. These guys are just out here living life. They’ve been given an opportunity, and they’re like, ‘F*** it. Like, let’s just do it.’ They’re just having some fun. I think the people that are hating [are] probably just jealous, and their lives are really boring …I mean, the more they hate on me, the more views I get, and the more money I make.”

    • SarcasticMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      3 days ago

      “…I mean, the more they hate on me, the more views I get, and the more money I make.”

      I think that pretty much sums up a big part of America’s problem right there lol

  • SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    This is the third name I’ve seen with a sex with hundreds of men title in the last month or so.

    In this a new trend??? In which case … I hate to be old school but wtf

    • hypnicjerk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      i assure you that group sex is not a new trend. it predates agriculture, civilization, and humanity itself.

      those numbers would have been incredibly difficult to organize in the pre-internet era however.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      It is, and there’s a handful of people trying to one-up each other.

      With great financial success, I might add.