weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 3 天前Big naturals is way easier to pronouncesub.wetshaving.socialimagemessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up11.16Karrow-down19
arrow-up11.15Karrow-down1imageBig naturals is way easier to pronouncesub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 3 天前message-square69fedilink
minus-squareSchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 天前you answered your own question
minus-squareewenak@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 天前Well what I learned in school was that zero was both positive and negative. I knew some people consider the natural numbers don’t include zero, but I didn’t know for some zero isn’t even positive.
minus-squareSchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-23 天前it is neither positive nor negative
minus-squaredeltapi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-23 天前I knew a physicist who considered 0 negative if she arrived at 0 coming from negative source numbers and positive if coming from positive sources. Something something sampling rate
minus-squareMBM@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 天前Some places (like France) talk about positive and strictly positive, others (like England) about non-negative and positive
you answered your own question
Well what I learned in school was that zero was both positive and negative. I knew some people consider the natural numbers don’t include zero, but I didn’t know for some zero isn’t even positive.
it is neither positive nor negative
I knew a physicist who considered 0 negative if she arrived at 0 coming from negative source numbers and positive if coming from positive sources.
Something something sampling rate
Some places (like France) talk about positive and strictly positive, others (like England) about non-negative and positive