The New Zealand Parliament has voted to impose record suspensions on three lawmakers who did a Maori haka as a protest. The incident took place last November during a debate on a law on Indigenous rights.

New Zealand’s parliament on Thursday agreed to lengthy suspensions for three lawmakers who disrupted the reading of a controversial bill last year by performing a haka, a traditional Maori dance.

Two parliamentarians — Te Pati Maori co-leaders Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi — were suspended for 21 days and one — Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke, from the same party — for seven days.

Before now, the longest suspension of a parliamentarian in New Zealand was three days.

  • nesc@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    Regretfully, democracy can be viewed as a dictature of majority over minority. I don’t think that there can be any clear cut answer to it. As for colonizers vs colonized, how far back do you consider this should go? As in any person of european descent forever in the future will be considered colonizer instead of people born on this land?

    • JacksonLamb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      A good democracy has checks and balances to protect minorities from mob rule /tyrrany of the majority.

      That is actually what this protest is about - the ruling party wants to remove some of those legal safeguards.

      New Zealand’s political system has proportional representation. Maori will most likely be in partial control after their next election.

    • theolodis@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think as long as the colonizers maintain an economically superior position, and keep the political power, there can be no real integration.

    • kadup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      democracy can be viewed as a dictatorship of the majority

      No. If you had even the most basic theoretical background on the subject you’d know how wrong this statement is. Yet people like you dangerously believe this surface level third grade understanding of democratic systems somehow makes them an expert.

      • nesc@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is an extremely vague statement that focuses on me instead of showing me and people like me where exactly we are wrong. Majority rule absolutely is common denominator in most democratic systems, so show me how it isn’t.

        • kadup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          It’s 2025, I’m not your middle school teacher, I’m not going to “show you” anything. Go learn the subject yourself, or don’t and keep repeating nonsense as if it were some deep insight, either way I’m fine.