• Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Mmm, not really.

    You can’t just slaughter civilians willy nilly. Well, you can, obviously, as shown by what’s going on in the world, but international laws say you shouldn’t.

    Iran could legally intern any Americans, but civilians wouldn’t still be POW’s. And should technically have rights and whatnot.

    • Derpenheim@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      International laws have said you shouldn’t since they were written, and not a single engagement has followed those laws. I disregard their existence as much as the people who enact war.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        To disregard their existence is to pretend they don’t matter at all, which is incredibly naive.

        There’s no perfect compliance, no, but if they weren’t respected at all and had no effect, the situations would be different.

        For instance yeah, Russia has apparently brought out WWI style choking agents and used them. But there’s no widespread use at least, and no mustard gas. Which would be more effective for Russia to do. But they don’t, as they want to keep plausible deniability so that Europe doesn’t gain an actual reason to mount an offensive.

        So yeah, while you are right in that psychotic asshats don’t care about them, they are affected by them nonetheless.

        Basically ROE says that medics shouldn’t be shot, but my brother trained as a medic and one of the first things they’ve we’re unofficially taught was to hide their crosses on the battlefield, as Russians would literally aim at medics. (Finnish army.)