• Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/left-liberals

    https://civix.ca/resources/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Backgrounder-Lesson-2-The-Political-Spectrum.pdf

    Liberal/Left-leaning people embrace social services and government intervention in the economy. Conservative/Right-leaning people support lower taxes, free markets and less government intervention in the economy. Libertarians advocate both personal and economic liberty (freedom). Authoritarians favour strict obedience to authority and government control, at the expense of personal and economic freedom.

    https://www.dictionary.com/e/leftright/

    the word left is applied to people and groups that have liberal views.

    • DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      lmao what is it with people trying to map abstract political concepts onto geometric and spacial shapes?

      The colloquial meaning of “liberal” used by some Americans does not align with how it’s used in political theory. That’s okay, words have different meaning in different contexts.

      “Left” and “right” stem from the French Revolution (1789!) where the people who sat on the left of the National Assembly were progressives that supported the revolution and people who sat on the right were conservatives that wanted to preserve the old system. Liberalism (as defined in political theory, not colloquially) is the dominant global ideology and thus is no longer progressive or radical. It may have been progressive when monarchy was the main form of government, propping up feudalism as the main economic structure. But that’s obviously not how the world works 200+ years later

    • This is a very typically American point of view, which tends to lump a lot of people together as “liberal” despite this internationally not being the norm at all.

      Here’s a definition of liberalism:

      Liberalism is a political philosophy and ideology that emphasizes individual rights, liberties, and limited government. It promotes ideas like free markets, free trade, and social equality, while often advocating for a strong emphasis on individual autonomy and civil liberties.

      Note specifically how it says individual rights. The idea with liberalism is that if everyone is similarly unrestrained by the government, and has the same civil liberties, there is an even playing field in which individuals can personally grow and excel. This neatly links together with the liberal belief in a free market, free trade, etc…

      A strict liberal idealogy will also adopt several progressive policies w.r.t. civil liberties, like gay rights (as this causes social equality -> level playing field for competition). But liberalism is still a strictly capitalist idealogy, with a strong emphasis on the free market and free trade.

      Generally, this individualistic approach to rights is considered socially progressive and economically right-wing. And we see that this is the case in most countries around the world, e.g. Australia’s liberal party or the Dutch VVD. The Dutch VVD is a good example to look at here, they are considered very firmly right-wing, but their party platform most closely matches to that of the DNC. In the US, the two major parties are both righg-wing, one is a moderately progressive right-wing party (with some left-wingers in there, but they aren’t very influential w.r.t. party policy because it’s such a small minority) and the other is a conservative/authoritarian right-wing party.

      Because both parties sit firmly on the right of the spectrum, they’ve come to distinguish themselves on social policy rather than economic policy. They’ve remapped the progressive-conservative axis on the left-right axis and called it a day. But in most countries, these axes are very much distinct. Here’s the “political compass” for the Netherlands for example:

      Note how there are only two fairly fringe parties to the right of the VVD. Also it’s interesting to note here that the PVV (the “far-right” party with the bird symbol near the bottom) isn’t even all that far right. Their economic policies aren’t actually all that focused on free market dynamics, and they do promote certain social policies. But their hardline immigration stance pushes them very firmly in the conservative camp. And although there’s certainly a correlation between left-progressive and right-conservative, there are still major differences between the parties along this diagonal axis.

      Generally, actual left-wing people (be they progressive or conservative) don’t like being lumped in with liberals, because they don’t focus on as much on individual freedom but rather on collective freedom and on policies that benefit the collective. Hence their insistence on actually looking at the full political spectrum rather than the simplified/reducted version of it.

      You’re not wrong that people in the US tend to call liberals “left-wing”, but it’s a very reductive, American perspective not shared by political scientists or the rest of the world.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, liberals tend to define the entire scope of political economy to a narrow, capitalist viewpoint. That doesn’t make it correct. A huge range of viewpoints narrowly occupies the “radical” portion, while an absolute mountain of space comparatively is given to subdivisions of capitalism. It’s a deeply silly graph.

      • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I think I get it. Right wing groups like koch Bros and heritage institutes push the left to fracture into very niche small subsets in order to isolate making it hard for those groups to organize and easier to kill them off. Much like how a cheetah separates a young calf from the herd. So what groups are you talking about for your “huge range of viewpoints”

        Totally not silly at all to get hyper specific about political ideology. I’m a liberal right center neo cat Audi rhino born a capitalist but transitioned to a socialist somewhere around 1992 when political synergy was at its peak

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Nah, it aint that deep. The left wants socialism, the right wants capitalism. There are differences in views among leftists and right-wingers, but the base is in if the principle aspect of the economy should be public, or private.

          • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Not all left want socialism. The political spectrum is not divided by “want socialism / do not want socialism”

            But you’re right it’s not that deep

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              1 day ago

              No, the left want socialism, be it anarchism, marxist socialism, etc. Capitalism is not the “absence of socialism,” it’s its own thing.

              You’re confusing people calling right-wing parties like the DNC “left” in the context of USian politics, but that’s because the left is fringe, in parties like PSL.

              What do you think makes the divide? Why are you so insistent on calling capitalism “left wing?”

              • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Jesus I’m so sick and tired of people parroting this DNC line. Nobody has mentioned the DNC here.

                Capitalism is not a defining feature of being left. There is more to being on the left than just socialist ideals

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I mentioned the DNC because it seemed like that’s what you were going for. It isn’t about “ideals,” it’s about property relations. Capitalism is the status quo, ergo liberalism is right wing.

                  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism

                    Among the various regional and national movements, the civil rights movement in the United States during the 1960s strongly highlighted the liberal efforts for equal rights.[197] The Great Society project launched by President Lyndon B. Johnson oversaw the creation of Medicare and Medicaid, the establishment of Head Start and the Job Corps as part of the War on Poverty and the passage of the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, an altogether rapid series of events that some historians have dubbed the “Liberal Hour”.[198]

                    Even in America, liberalism is left. And the meme interpreted as the left absolutely stands