jackeroni@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 days agoJust bafflinglemmy.mlimagemessage-square261fedilinkarrow-up1623arrow-down180
arrow-up1543arrow-down1imageJust bafflinglemmy.mljackeroni@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 days agomessage-square261fedilink
minus-squareMelvin_Ferd@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down16·1 day agoDefinitely am not. I have plenty of supporting links. You all have … Comments
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·18 hours agoMy other reply to you was literally entirely composed of a supporting link. Quit being disingenuous.
minus-squareMelvin_Ferd@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down5·18 hours agoAnd I told you, you posted a link to classic liberalism. It is a subset of liberalism it is not liberalism
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·1 day agoNo. We’re right. You’ve been given references. Just because you obstinantly ignore those references does not make you correct or smart.
minus-squareMelvin_Ferd@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down15·1 day agoNo I’m right I gave references, nobody has provided anything that has shown that liberalism is right
You are factually incorrect.
Definitely am not. I have plenty of supporting links. You all have … Comments
My other reply to you was literally entirely composed of a supporting link. Quit being disingenuous.
And I told you, you posted a link to classic liberalism. It is a subset of liberalism it is not liberalism
No. We’re right. You’ve been given references. Just because you obstinantly ignore those references does not make you correct or smart.
No I’m right I gave references, nobody has provided anything that has shown that liberalism is right