• mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Business model. Legislating the fucking business model.

      Jesus fuck, what is it about this industry that makes people flip out about any sort of consumer protection? You know this is fucked up. You know “just don’t buy it!” will never help. What other possible solution do you imagine, besides telling companies to just sell a product, without any exorbitant double-dipping?

      • blazera@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        the business model of…charging too much money? No, I dont have any issue with this. I have a lot of issues with Blizzard, but this ain’t on the list. It sounds like a smart way to alleviate expansion launch server burden, giving both a much better experience for some, and an improved launch for the rest.

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          … it’s a subscription service! They already get a shitload of money, every single month. Don’t bemoan their server costs. That’s what you’re already paying for!

          • blazera@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I didnt say server costs, I said server burden. Long queue times on launch day, server crashes, very unevenly distributed server load when everyone is in the same area at the start. I remember FF14’s latest expansion was so bad, they completely halted sales of it. Forget too expensive, there was no price, you could not buy it if you were late.

            You dont have to pay $90, because you dont have to buy this early access. you dont have to buy the regular access. You are not entitled to this game as a human right, the developers didnt have to make this game, and they dont have to let you play it for whatever price you want. They get to decide the price.

            • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Hair-splitting. They have your money already. Services breaking down is not a problem solved by charging more - as you point out, for FF14. Charging more than the price of an entire new game, for three fucking days of opt-in beta testing, is completely absurd.

              Any form of taking your money for bullshit is reducing how much you can spend on things that matter. This ultracapitalist zeal for equating price and value only makes a lick of sense if it’s rational people making informed decisions - and there’s a thousand other ways we identify and forbid irrational uses of money.

              Outright confidence scams have seen victims come back with more money, thinking it’ll work out this time. Revenue alone absolves nothing.

              • blazera@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Yeah, charging more is a very common way to alleviate service congestion, like amusement parks. They have the same sort of early access for more money deals. or very popular dine in restaurants, concerts, anything where capacity is a concern really.

                Any form of taking your money

                They are not taking anything, they do not have access to your wallet or your bank account. You can choose to give them your money. No one is making you, you have all of your money to spend on things that matter. If this doesnt matter to you? Dont have to spend a cent on it. Make your own MMO and charge less for it.

                • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  First paragraph: ‘it happens a bunch’ never makes direct monetary exploitation better.

                  Second paragraph: strawman based on stupid word game. Less than hair-splitting. A lie about what I fucking obviously mean, by comparing this abuse to a scam, not theft.

                  • blazera@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    this is no strawman, I quoted you, you’re claiming they’re taking your money. Because otherwise what point do you even have? Nothing is happening because they dont have your money if you’re not giving it to them of your own free will for a service you very much do not need or have any innate entitlement to. It’s only a problem for you because you want that service, you think you are entitled to it for a cheaper price.

                    Please, take up game programming. 3D modeling, rigging, animating, shading, level designing, server coding, writing, music composing, voice acting, localizing, play testing, bug fixing. On the scale of World of Warcraft. You can sell it for whatever price you want after you’ve paid the hundreds of people you had to get help because you didnt know how to. You have no appreciation for what you think you’re entitled to.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Try this on for size. Split them up, make them worker owned, or strip their IP and open source it. Send a message that anti consumer behavior is dangerous - that your investments could go to zero.

      Blizzard and Activision stood up there at the ftc and promised their merger would lead to better products at better prices for customers. Their customers overwhelmingly disagree. Microsoft and Activision/Blizzard said the same. It’s all worse and more expensive.

      Companies exist for people, not the other way around. They don’t have rights, they don’t have feelings, and if we do nothing everything we love will turn to shit.

      We’re in the endgame. Companies are cannibalizing themselves and each other to desperately extend their profit growth for one more quarter. Not to mention, they do that by squeezing their customers just a little harder from all sides

      We need rules and boundaries to the game, or this becomes the only workable playstyle for the board of every publicly traded corporation. We’re going to crash - we’ve colonized the whole world (or at least every place with resources highly profitable to extract). The rate of growth can’t increase - new markets and technologies will open up areas for growth now and then, but certainly not quarterly. Cannibalizing existing industries is going pretty damn fast, and either we stop it now or we stop it once everything is terrible and our technology sucks.

      Either way, we’re going to have to tackle climate change and inequality…

      • blazera@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You seem to be ranting about something else entirely, we’re talking about an announced price for a game

          • blazera@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Sure. See, im not gonna buy this game, and Im gonna still have my $90 dollars.

            Someone else who does want that early access for $90 will get what they want.

            • theneverfox@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              That’s not even you voting with your wallet. That’s just you not buying a thing because it’s too expensive. That’s an example of price elasticity

              Voting with your wallet is this flawed concept that consumers can control companies through individuals boycotting their products.

              For example, I uninstalled hearthstone and quit Blizzard along with many others back when they let China censor a US esports player who commented on Hong Kong protests. But now I wouldn’t buy anyways, because their games suck and their payment schemes are obscene

              All they know is they lost n customers in that time period, and failed to recover m

              • blazera@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                That’s just you not buying a thing because it’s too expensive.

                yeah, that’s what Im doing. I am not hurt in anyway by not buying this thing, no one is making me buy it. That is an option for literally everyone, no one has to buy it. Im not a protesting activist trying to change Blizzard, Im simply not affected by this. The only people that are, are people that want to pay $90 for early access. If they dont want to, nobody is making them.

                • theneverfox@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Yeah, that’s fine. I’m also not interested, because i don’t play wow anymore

                  But the phrase “voting with your wallet” is a term loaded with a narrative to justify everything under capitalism, from anti-consumer behaviors to blaming working people for climate change. Neoconservatives and Libertarians use the idea for how deregulation and privitization is the solution to everything

                  You don’t seem to believe in that nonsense, so I’d encourage you to not use the phrase