• Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    Are the solar panels even efficient enough at those angles to the sun to generate more electricity than they cost in weight?

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yes, by a small amount, unless you live in the arctic circle or something.

      But does that mean they’re worth it? Probably not. There’s the financial cost as well as the weight. Plus potentially eating into head room. Plus it’s another thing to potentially go wrong.

      I certainly see the use case for campervans - a large flat roof is ideal, and being able to park for a couple of days and charge a leisure battery without flattening your main battery or running an engine seems perfect.

      But for a passenger car, the use seems more limited.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Maybe with some of the super cheap perovskite cells coming out? Maybe.

        It’s a very marginal idea, at best. Even in equatorial regions under perfect weather, there just isn’t that much solar power you can collect with the space of a car roof.

    • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Aptera is attempting to do this. They had to engineer their own solar panels for the car. Probably the closest thing they have to production ready. They also had to make the car super efficient to make it work. Peak output of their design is about 700W

        • spongebue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          700 watts = .7 kW

          If you figure 10 hours of that (or longer but with less-perfect conditions) you can get 7kWh. I estimate about 3.5 miles per kWH on my Bolt. Not sure this car’s efficiency, but it gives us a ballpark number. That would give about 25 miles of driving. I understand that there are plenty of other factors that can go into this, but “fewer than 10 miles in perfect conditions” isn’t necessarily accurate either.

          • Cort@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I would respectfully argue that 5 hours of peak output equivalent is more realistic as that’s what you’d get from static panels at the proper angle. But I didn’t figure in the claimed efficiency of the car.

            My car, Ford cmax energi, was tested with a 500 watt panel and that only yielded 5 miles a day in great conditions. More like 2-3 miles most days, and that’s at roughly 300wh/mi., similar to your bolt. Never made it to production with solar.

            • spongebue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              But even that number you say is realistic, about half of what I just said, would still give a little more than the “less than 10 miles under perfect conditions” - I still don’t think it’s really that practical or worth the cost for a number of reasons, but I also like crunching numbers to know what it would look like before making that judgment.

              Curious, how did you get power from a solar panel into a high-voltage battery?

              • Cort@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Wasn’t me personally. Solar was tested by the university of Georgia iirc. And I’d assume some sort of DC boost converter to boost the 30v to 300v when connecting the panel to the battery pack