Exciting news for who? Only the site owner is excited that a free resource now requires a subscription

“Yay! Now I have to pay another subscription! I’m so excited! Let’s celebrate with them!” - nobody

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Subtitles are like 5kb text files, why even limit their downloads in any way?

    • jayandp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The overhead isn’t the storage but the request. Processing a request takes CPU time, which can get expensive when people setup a media server and request subtitles for dozens of movies and shows. Every episode of a TV show is a separate request and that can add up fast when you scale it to thousands of users.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      If they’re storing them in something like Amazon s3, there is a cost (extremely low, but not free) associated with retrieving data regardless of size.

      Even if they were an entirely free service, it’d make sense to put hard rate limits on unauthenticated users and more generous rate limits on authenticated ones.

      Leaving out rate limits is a good way to discover that you have users who will use your API real dumb.

      Their pricing model seems fucked, but that’s aside from the rate limits.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Electricity aint exactly free. Even if the data they store is minuscule. Servers will pull >300w if you store 10gb or 2000gb.