• FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    They might as well try banning fashion and individual choice. Just because you ban destroying clothing if it doesn’t sell doesn’t mean that people will automatically wear it. Just walk into any resale shop/goodwill store and see the amount of clothes there that are practically given away and people are still picky about it. “MEP Alessandra Moretti, who spearheaded the legislation through parliament, said: "It is time to end the model of ‘take, make, dispose’ that is so harmful to our planet, our health and our economy.” " Well I don’t know about her, but I have a simple set of shirts, pants, socks and underwear that I have just been rotating through for years (yes I wash them). Sounds like they need to work on the stigma of wearing clothes more than once…

    • ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Much better if they’re simply given away as charity as the end stop instead of literally sent into the incinerator to try and extract a fraction of the energy that went into making it. At least that way people who literally can’t afford clothes get to wear something new, clean and whole.

    • Krause [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      They might as well try banning fashion and individual choice.

      good

      you don’t need 30 different brands of white shirts or 100 different brands of the same fucking chocolate cookie