• 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    Folks will say arch.

    But honestly any modern Linux system with 3rd party drivers will work. Mint pop_os arch Manjaro Debian Ubuntu etc

    I’m running a 1660 and an i5 64xx on kubuntu 24.04 Granted that stuff is older but you’ll have the same experience.

    Unless you’re running the absolute bleeding edge… You’ll not have a lot of problems.

    *Ymmv of course but majority of folks won’t have issues.

    • HeyMrDeadMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The the Arch software repos are incredible and the Arch Wiki is, quite frankly, a work of art that should be celebrated with the same reverence as the Mona Lisa or David’s uncircumcised cock.

      But anyone recommending Arch to a Linux newbie needs a psych evaluation.

      I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve read stories to the effect of, “yeah, a regular package update bricked my desktop, but I just rolled my face across the keyboard and recompiled the offending software and got back to work, no big deal.”

      Cool. I’m so glad you can do that my guy, I really am. But how the hell do you expect average computer user to figure that out? The first time a software update leaves them at a command prompt with some cryptic GDM error message or a Nvidia kernel panic or something, they’re going running back to Billy Gates’ warm walled garden embrace. Shit, I like to think I’m half competent with Linux and I’d shit myself if that happened to me.

      EDIT: Sorry, @[email protected], I didn’t nessicarily mean to direct any of that to you specifically, it’s sort of just my standard copy pasta whenever I see Arch reccomded.

      • 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Haha I agree arch is the meme recommendation. It has its benefits like you’ve detailed out… but it’s not for a windows convert. I’ve ran it, it can require more fiddling than some of the other distros. Tinkering that newbies can’t do.

        Me I’m an apt man. So I tend to suggest distros that center around that package manager… it just so happens that they are some of the newbie ones.

        I once installed mint on my ex father in laws machine and it ran perfectly for ages for him (with auto updates) They were spending $$$s a quarter on windowa system cleanup due to viruses. As he was an online slot machine / junk flash game player. So of course he would get all the viruses. Once he went mint, he had 0 issues (with the os) the issues he had was more user error with online behavior.

        Anyway. No problem for the gruffness of your reply, as I agree with what you’ve said. :)