It’s been a little bit, but I’m back! As usual, not my blog, just a good community share. Authors are on Mastodon at @[email protected]
It’s been a little bit, but I’m back! As usual, not my blog, just a good community share. Authors are on Mastodon at @[email protected]
They are not open sourcing anything. They just want people to contribute. The license is not open in any good way fit the users.
What licence are they using?
Do you know something everyone else does not?Just because Llama Group want to control what goes into FreeLlama? Just like every other open source with a leadership?If I release project qwtop as open source I still retain ownership of my code and make the decisions about what makes it into the main release; how is this different so far, when we haven’t seen the licence?<edit: see post below>
thanks, there was nothing about a licence with the original post that i saw