If lemmy had user-defined filters, I’d use them. Right now I’m downvoting the stuff, but there’s already a community for musk-related stuff: [email protected]

  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes!

    Please yes.

    I’m tired of seeing the same story of that chode in six or seven different communities.

  • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Musk has already been banned as a topic on tech communities in 4 instances I’ve seen personally. I get folks are tired of him and I find him insufferable, but he is often relevant (unfortunately) to current events, so I don’t think wholesale bans of him are a good idea. There are plenty of topics I find annoying, but I don’t tell people to ban the topic from the community just for my personal preference.

    Like I think trump is a cringe inducing piece of shit and don’t enjoy seeing him everywhere. I’d love a filter, I don’t expect communities to ban him as a topic.

    • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah but relevant to current tech events? Not that often.

      It’s complicated I guess.

      Musk offering starlink access to gaza is tech news, him changing subscription prices for xitter is not.

      I guess I just mean that a happening is not “tech” by virtue of musk saying it.

      • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        He owns starlink, Twitter, Tesla, and SpaceX. Whether we like it or not all of these have huge bearings on their respective industries.

        And before people started hating musk, again rightfully so I’m embarrassed I ever liked him, you couldn’t go a day without something about SpaceX and people getting all excited. This is purely about the person, not the relevance of the topics.

        If y’all could somehow come up with a nuanced soft ban on “his personal life“ and politics or whatever, I guess that’s a decent compromise? But that just sounds tedious and people will bicker. And also his politics unfortunately have an impact on how Twitter is run, so you would have to find ways to separate those things out. It’s just seems kind of needless.

        I mean imagine if we couldn’t spread the word/learn of what he was doing with his starlink satellites and Ukraine/Russia. That stuff is really important.

        • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The nuanced soft ban you’re talking about is just the topic of the community.

          When musk does something tech related that’s tech. When he does something that’s not tech related that’s off topic.

          Twitter is a social media website it’s not tech.

  • ZooGuru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some Lemmy apps have filters. I use Memmy for Lemmy and it has filters. That assumes you use your phone and not a browser.

  • Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Holy cow, this sounds like a moderation nightmare–glad I don’t have to do it! There’s no way you’re going to get through it without someone complaining about it.

    In my mind, this is definitely something that individuals should address with blocks and filters. If those filters don’t exist, they should be written.

  • witx@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, that would be beneficial for him and like-minded people. It creates a bubble around him where only his supporters know what’s going on.