• IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Economic inequality being one of the biggest drivers of democratic back sliding. Shitty part is that authoritarian doesn’t really offer anything better.

    The wealthiest people of this world have created a world that’s tearing itself apart. And their only hedge is the thought that we will all be too busy killing each other that we forget completely about them. Hence these megalomaniacs that appear as distraction to keep us fighting each other.

    • MenKlash@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Economic inequality being one of the biggest drivers of democratic back sliding.
      Shitty part is that authoritarian doesn’t really offer anything better.

      Hey! Let’s solve “economic inequality” with more statism! That’s not authoritarian at all!

      Obviously, wanting to reduce the monopolical privileges of politicians, public spending and taxes (robbery), erradicating the central bank, increasing work flexibility and advocating for individual rights and liberty is fascist af. Believe me, guys!

      • AliasAKA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If taxes are robbery then using public infrastructure like roads without paying taxes is also theft.

        Taxes exist because public goods are actually good, and benefit everyone. The sum of the parts is greater than the individual parts. Your taxes pay for roads and public transit which are used to get people to work to create wealth for a community. It turns out the thing that makes humans great is community and banding together. Taxes are a formal way of doing that.

        Now, we need equitable taxes, but that would involve taxing the rich proportionally. This is economically sound because wealth doesn’t trickle down and the mega wealthy are, well, mega wealthy because they hoard wealth. That money would be better spent creating better roads, better public transit, better education, or in short, a better community. The prospect of a better community only upsets those who are not members of the community, because their insane wealth puts them in a different class, and those who think defending that class will somehow get them privilege. The only privilege we need is a better community.

        • MenKlash@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Taxes exist because public goods are actually good, and benefit everyone.

          Taxes raise money for transfers to special interests and public employees. Why would you trust an oligarchy of politicians (the State) to decide which goods are useful “for a community” and which don’t?

          In contrast to private businesses that supply the goods that consumers voluntarily want to buy, public officials lack of the capacity to pick data as to what people truly demand, much less how to go about meeting those demands economically. They don’t have direct feedback of what every individual in the community want; they don’t pass the test of economic rationality.

          If the Monopoly of Violence can’t act economically, they have no other choice but respond to interest groups, so tax money will necessarily end up with narrow interest groups rather than the provision of “public goods”

          The sum of the parts is greater than the individual parts.

          The end does not justify the means. The mere existence of taxation is detrimental (and antithetical) to the very source of economic growth, that is, voluntary exchange.

          Goods like education and roads, for example, are goods like any other: they can be supplied by markets and markets alone.

          The only privilege we need is a better community.

          A better community will be formed if it’s achieved by voluntary means. Moral obligation is not the same as legal obligation. How can individuals be virtuous? By letting them act freely.

          • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Why would you trust an oligarchy of politicians (the State) to decide which goods are useful “for a community” and which don’t?

            Because we voted for them. We didn’t vote for the board of directors of private companies. There’s plenty of waste and corruption in private enterprise. It’s not voluntary if they lie cheat and steal just like bad politicians.

            • MenKlash@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because we voted for them.

              The fraud of representative democracy. What about those who didn’t vote them (the tyranny of the majority)? We, the common citizens, have really any power if our vote is secret?

              The rights and obligations of a contractual act are generated by explicit consent of both members. This does not happen when we our vote is completely secret, without our names and surnames. Politicians are free to impose their monopolical powers, even if we don’t choose them.

              “Representative democracy is the illusion of universal participation in the use of institutional coercion."

              We didn’t vote for the board of directors of private companies.

              Because we shouldn’t. Except for the lobbyists, they are using their private property and their factors of production achieved by social-cooperation.

              There’s plenty of waste and corruption in private enterprise. It’s not voluntary if they lie cheat and steal just like bad politicians.

              The only difference is that, in a free-market setting, they wouldn’t have any monopolical privileges to mantain their economical power and reputation in the market, as their permanence is dependent of supply and demand.

              • racsol@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Stop being so based.

                1st-world leftists are going to downvote you.

      • Coki91@dormi.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I cant believe an actually informed comment exists on this thread, everytime Milei pops on here its an Article calling him fascist and everyone on the comments agreeing to it

          • Coki91@dormi.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I… dont see how that’s related? Informed opinions dont have/dont need to be from my friends

            But I have invited some friends to Lemmy, sure.