• spacesatan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Except you don’t need to eat animals and so it is the same. You’re killing animals for your entertainment, just because you eat them after that doesn’t change anything.

    • kaffiene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      People have eaten meat for thousands of years. That’s been a matter of survival, not entertainment. But my comment was about people taking joy in killing, which is what the meme is about, not taking joy in eating,. I appreciate your zeal but I’d prefer you to not ascribe to me arguments I didn’t make

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      You’re killing animals for your entertainment, just because you eat them after that doesn’t change anything.

      sure thing edgelord.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t think

          coulda stopped there.

          Furthermore, I don’t care what you think. You come up with silly bullshit like ‘you’re killing animals for entertainment’ as if they’re not consumed for food. Dislike meat eating all you want, but use your fucking brain - if it’s being killed for consumption (it’s an industry, so like, that part is important, capitalism gotta cha-ching or it’s not doing it’s insidious thing) and the factories aren’t putting out a live stream, in fact, they go to great lengths to make sure NO ONE from the outside see how the sausage is made. So it’s not entertainment.

          With thoughts like these, it would be counterproductive to waste any time caring what you think about, that would be a waste of calories.

          • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            The “entertainment” here I believe refers to the pleasurable experience of eating the animal as food. Since it’s not out of necessity

            • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              I don’t eat for entertainment, I don’t have that kind of budget.

              and I don’t think the people eating pork are doing it from a “GEE THIS SURE IS LUXURIOUS INPUT” - I think it’s mostly cheap protein with many downsides.

              yes I still eat bacon when I can get it. no I don’t consider it ‘entertainment’ .

              what a silly discussion.

    • wakumul@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      you don’t know what they need. and I seriously doubt they are killing for entertainment. I doubt they kill anything at all.

      • spacesatan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Paying someone to kill someone/something for you is still killing.

        “but what if they have a medical condition that doesn’t exist that I just made up”

        Pretty unlikely.

        • wakumul@lemm.ee
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          And paying someone to kill someone/something for you is still killing.

          most people don’t do that, either

          • businessfish@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            how do you think meat gets to the grocery store? someone has to kill an animal, and the person buying the meat typically pays money for it.

            • wakumul@lemm.ee
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              the person doing the killing is usually paid by someone but most people are neither killing nor paying the killers. they are both paid long before someone walks into a grocery store.

              • businessfish@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 months ago

                they are paid because people buy the products. if nobody bought the products, there would be no money in it. are you trying to say that people would be paid to kill animals even if nobody bought animal products?

                • wakumul@lemm.ee
                  cake
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  i’m saying i know how linear time works, so i know that buying meat on a shelf can’t have caused the animal it came from to be killed.

                  • rekorse@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Its not buying it that causes the death, its that you’ve shown you want the meat, so the company is killing the animal to produce the meat for you to buy.

                    You want meat, they produce meat. You dont want meat, they stop producing meat.