I’m not mad, just think it’s hilarious how naive/delusional you and others like you are. You’re a walking irony. You want the police to protect you, but not because they’re tyrants…you want the gov to protect you but not because they’re fascist… it’s kinda sad.
Naa I know plenty about anti-2a people like you. You’re all the same. You want to disarm us all, but then either have no response to how to keep people safe or say asinine shit that goes directly against what you’re proposing.
So please tell me righteous one, you get rid of the guns overnight, and trump is elected or 12 years from now another trumpite is elected… what’s your plan? The police are still armed and now they (trump/trumpite) control the military, which mind you are mainly made up of gun owners who vote red. So either trump isn’t a fascist threat to you or your naive… it’s one or the other.
No thanks. I’m not playing your game because A) I get nothing out of it B) you already have your mind made up about me and C) I have zero interest in attempting to change your opinion just for you to try and poke holes in what I say
There’s literally zero science against the fact that gun control works and every bit of science agrees that gun control works as surely as antibiotics do.
Just to let gun nuts know though, I’m pretty tired of the same NRA propaganda, and I am talking about actual science, so just know that me not answering your tantrum-y bullshit isn’t to be taken as me not wanting to reply. It’s gonna be me ignoring the shit out of any reply that doesn’t have a link to a study by a credible university.
Haha. You showed up just to get mad and do exactly what I expected. Predictable
I’m not mad, just think it’s hilarious how naive/delusional you and others like you are. You’re a walking irony. You want the police to protect you, but not because they’re tyrants…you want the gov to protect you but not because they’re fascist… it’s kinda sad.
Don’t put words in my mouth. I haven’t given you anything about me, so don’t assume you know me. You know what happens when you assume
Naa I know plenty about anti-2a people like you. You’re all the same. You want to disarm us all, but then either have no response to how to keep people safe or say asinine shit that goes directly against what you’re proposing.
So please tell me righteous one, you get rid of the guns overnight, and trump is elected or 12 years from now another trumpite is elected… what’s your plan? The police are still armed and now they (trump/trumpite) control the military, which mind you are mainly made up of gun owners who vote red. So either trump isn’t a fascist threat to you or your naive… it’s one or the other.
Did I get it all wrong?
You got every bit wrong haha. Guess you don’t know as much as you think. It’s also ironic that you’re calling me righteous
Ok tell me how wrong I am then. What’s your solution champ?
No thanks. I’m not playing your game because A) I get nothing out of it B) you already have your mind made up about me and C) I have zero interest in attempting to change your opinion just for you to try and poke holes in what I say
Ok sure thing.
That guy is tired so I can continue.
There’s literally zero science against the fact that gun control works and every bit of science agrees that gun control works as surely as antibiotics do.
https://epirev.oxfordjournals.org/content/38/1/140.full.pdf+html
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hicrc/firearms-research/guns-and-death/
Just to let gun nuts know though, I’m pretty tired of the same NRA propaganda, and I am talking about actual science, so just know that me not answering your tantrum-y bullshit isn’t to be taken as me not wanting to reply. It’s gonna be me ignoring the shit out of any reply that doesn’t have a link to a study by a credible university.