• Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Thanks for this!

    It didn’t actually get much coverage in Europe because political “debates” are just infantile shit-smearing in the US

    Edit - fuck me that’s almost unreadable. A third of you guys vote for that fucking deranged baboon?

    • nandeEbisu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      They didn’t used to be. Maybe you’d have some less popular candidates try and get a jab in for publicity during the primaries, but the presidential debated used to be for attacking the other guy’s policies while making yourself seem likeable and confident. And back before TV, they actually had to sound smart too.

    • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yep.

      This is because one party has actively went against education tooth and nail. (except for THEIR kids, who get to go to schools that teach them how to take advantage of people who don’t have the best education like they do) - ReDUMBlicans

      The other party has been too busy trying to find common ground and taking the higher road to even get the fools who vote for people like Trump and their ilk a view of how crazy their little imaginary team is. - Democrats

      The good news is that I watched the entire debate, and was satisfied enough with Kamala’s performance.

      I will say that I don’t think giving people child tax cuts is cool in my book, because people like me have chose to not have kids because of the current whacko bullshit that the entire world is gulping down right now. I detest people having kids in this current environment getting money for being selfish to the future of their kids, but I’m still all for Kamala. She did good!