• FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Agreed.

    No f’in way this happens, especially not in the same week when Kamala Harris goes on national TV to say she’s a capitalist.

    With that said, I still hope they try. It should be inconvenient at least to run a monopoly.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      especially not in the same week when Kamala Harris goes on national TV to say she’s a capitalist.

      You can rest assured that that is a meticulously prepared statement to curry favor and win elections in specific areas, and nothing to do with her personal ideology or how she will run things as President.

      • TeenieBopper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Look, I’m voting for Harris, and even as a leftist I’m half excited by it. But let’s not pretend a mainstream democratic party politician is anything other than a capitalist. She might have good policy ideas, ones that will genuinely help people, but she’s still a capitalist.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I’d love to believe that, but Democrats have ruled as pro-corporate assholes for 40 years now. The last Dem we had with the balls to oppose corporate rule was LBJ.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      It should be inconvenient at least to run a monopoly.

      The best our government can do is make mega corpos pay lawyers … So at least we got some extra jobs out of it 🤡

      Since they are creating extra jobs shouldn’t government reward them with state aid for it?!