• GladiusB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    You don’t know any sort of research I have done or anything about my background. There is actual proof that Russians used social media, paid for by Cambridge Analytica funded by Trump’s inner circle.

    Creating such discourse was their tactic to manipulate fringe undecideds to lean towards Trump. But don’t let facts get in your way when you know so much about so little.

    • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, there is proof that in 2016, Russian agents did that. I haven’t disputed that.

      The reason I dispute the application of this knowledge to me is that its wrong. Like I’m a literal US voter with an Only Fans that connects to my US issued ID. It’s pretty clear I’m not Russian. And given how antitrump and for democracy I am, I’m not on the Trump pay roll either.

      They didn’t create this discourse. The democrats DID IT. Like Clinton literally rode on Epstein’s plane. That’s his fault. They literally had a conflict of interest with their donations to the DNC and running as candidates. That’s genuine issues they did. Criticizing that, engaging in the definition of critical thinking, is part of the democratic process so we can stop it from happening again. That Republicans brought up the factual things the DNC did as issues is just normal campaigning. Abnormal campaigns were the disinformation the Russian bots put forward which later directly resulted in American deaths when it came to COVID.

      Do you like, talk to real people irl about politics? Most people irl aren’t diehard DNC or RNC bootlickers. Most people are somewhere in between. That you refuse to tolerate other political opinions besides DNC bootlicking shows how “informed” you are alone.