I genuinely do not know who the bad guys are. S lot of my leftist friends are against Israel, but from what I know Israel was attacked and is responding and trying to get their hostages back.

Enlighten me. Am I wrong? Why am I wrong?

And dumb it down for me, because apparently I’m an idiot.

  • Goat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    There are no “good guys” in a conflict between religious people.

    Read the excellent Decolonize Palestine website to learn about the vital context that makes Israel’s claim of self defense deeply disingenuous, and to learn about some of the falsehoods about Israel and Palestine that are present in mainstream discourse.

    • TonoManza@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are no “good guys” in a conflict between religious people.

      So the people fighting everyday to stop the literal genocide of their people can’t be good…because they are religious?

    • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are no “good guys” in a conflict between religious people.

      Religion does play a role in the conflict, particularly over the question of where the border between an Israeli and Palestian state should go (so that holy sites end up on the appropriate side), but I don’t think it’s very useful to understand this as a religious conflict.

      The Jews who moved to Israel in the early 20th century weren’t pilgrims. They were refugees fleeing political persecution. The founder of Zionism wasn’t even religious.

      And Israel didn’t happen because religious Jews enthusiastically got behind the idea of Zionism. Israel happened because Britain got behind the idea of Zionism.

      Because the Crusdaes of the 11th to 13th centuries still loom large in Western culture (Richard the Lionheart and all that), I think Westerners have a tendency to think that the situation in Israel/Palestine is a continuation of those conflicts. But it’s really not. It’s a 20th century creation.

      • dontgooglefinderscult@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        The first violent Zionist settlers started migrating in the late 1800s, not the 20th century, this is more Zionist propaganda that leaves out the early terror in Palestine that foreshadowed the rest of the conflict. These early terror groups were mostly ineffective, but their eventual dissolution lead to Zionist thought spreading to what are now the top supporters and financiers of Israel. the rest of the comment is spot on though.

      • belastend@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The largest armed force in the gaza strip is deeply religious and the entire reason the support they receive from their biggest ally, the IRR, is religion. If Hamas were Sunni muslims instead of Shia, Iran would remain silent. Just as they were, when their Shia allies in Syria and Yemen started to massacre non-Shia in the region.

      • small44@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Arabs leaders was also so stupid, they kicked most of the non zionist jews from Arabs lands in response to kicking out Palestinians after 48 loss instead of trying to make them allies

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Where are the good guys in non-religious (scientific) leaders?

      They are all scheming to gain more power and control.

      Humans are just not emotionally ready to recognize where all this leads.