• The Pantser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    A recall that 99% won’t be claimed since if you are buying butter you know it contains milk. Gotta be real dumb to think the butter is milk free.

    • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      You do realize we’re talking about the same society that requires a warning label to not eat the shampoo?

    • Ham Strokers Ejacula@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It isn’t about people not knowing butter has milk, its about enforcing the law so they don’t “accidentally” leave off legally required information.

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      They’ll just put a sticker on it that says “contains milk”. This is like one of those Tesla recalls that is really just a software update done to meet federal or state requirements.

      • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Exactly. I know someone who works in the food trade industry - this isn’t even that rare, small fuckups like this happen, except usually they get rectified long before local regulator intervenes

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      The US is the most litigious country in the world. They’re likely making sure all bases are covered just in case.

    • weastie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      To be fair, the word butter is very vague. Shea butter has no milk, apple butter has no milk, etc.