Why not? Are my posts not good enough for you Mr Bluesky?
It’s open to the public. So, many other orgs are certainly doing it anyway.
But did they pinky promise?
… for now
Won’t train AI on your posts
until we reach critical mass of users.Oh it will as soon as the investors demand more ReTurN oN iNvEsTmEnT.
Then we leave that platform too. I have zero loyalty. Zero.
I only have it because my family chose that over Mastodon. Mastodon is better.
Lol okay. Sounds good, bro.
yet
deleted by creator
Trust me bro, just keep shit posing on here, we won’t change out “ToS”
BlueskAI on the other hand…
“Well, WE won’t train on your data. But this subsidiary company we created on the other hand…”
Or one of our 12675 carefully selected partners
If the AT protocol allows public access to content, they can’t create a proprietary training set. But the content is available for anyone who wants to add it to a public training set.
Sounds exactly like something that someone intending to train an AI would say.
Does it?
OK, what would they say if they weren’t planning on it?
IMO, they wouldn’t even mention any concept of AI at all, to begin with. They should carry on as they were already going, without bothering to say anything good or bad about AI. If they’re really committed to not involve AI within their platform, they could even create strict community rules regarding AI content and AI usage, limiting or blocking them. As some would say, actions say more than words, because even parrots and crows can speak… Even LLMs can speak!
Better BlueSky than Twitter, but I hope everyone understands by now that there’s literally no reason to take a business’s word for anything unless they somehow have legally obligated themselves to doing that thing forever. Otherwise you can only trust them to keep doing it for as long as it’s worth it from an economic perspective. I’m not saying that it can’t ever happen that a business acts out of pure goodwill, but only a fool would count on it.
