• BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think the implication is that rich people don’t have popcorn ceilings, so if you do, you don’t make enough money that his tax plan will hurt you. The premise seems flawed to me, but I could be interpreting it wrong.

        • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Coffered ceilings aren’t that expensive so long as you have 10ft ceilings.

          If you have standard 8ft ceilings you need to raise the ceiling to meet the 8ft code, which can be very expensive or infeasible(if you dont have an attic above the room.).

          The poor version is to put a couple layers of drywall up to create the pattern, it does not look great.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            I’ve done regular drywall ceiling more than once and I can’t imagine how you would make good looking coffered ceiling out of drywall layers 😂

            • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              That is the neat part, you can’t.

              I have seen people who did like 2 layers on top of the original drywall and threw in some quarter round and denture, trashy. One was single layer and it was poorly mudded and separating at the transition with some screw dents, so I am wondering when it is going to fall off. I had some real “retirement project” vibes from the house, so I am guessing grandpa was “handy”.

      • Jknaraa@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Pretty sure people with those ceilings don’t have to worry either, because they have plenty of tricks to hide their wealth from taxes. I get what OP means, but they really missed the mark, because it’s pretty much only people with ceilings like the one he posted that actually have to worry: Rich enough to own a suburban home, but not rich enough to indulge in elaborate tax schemes.

      • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        The 3rd one looks like tin paneling, which is the middle class cheap imitation of a carved wood panel ceiling. So they would be at risk, depending on their actual income.

    • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ah, I was thinking “it’s probably asbestos so long term financial planning is not something you should worry about” but your interpretation makes way more sense.

    • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      will the tax plan actually “hurt” the rich or will it simply limit their means to get even richer?

      • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It is 2024 and words can be violence against someone, as per Antifa. Money is free speech, as per Citizens United v FEC.

        Taxing the rich specifically is literally harming their right to free speech violently, just because they are successful.

        I say gag them unless they have something of value to say to the people who allow them to talk.

    • Jknaraa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t think you’re wrong. I grew up in a more affluent area, and these types of ceilings are very popular there.

      • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        How affluent? Because few people compared to the population actually make more than $400,000/year. So the meme would still stand.