• AProfessional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Snap is vendor lock in. They don’t work on many distros, tooling pushes their platform, and they control the only store.

        For desktop apps Flatpak is just technically better anyway so what’s the point.

  • BitSound@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re going to get a lot of comments about Ubuntu and snaps. Definitely one of the reasons I switched away from it.

    • PorkSoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      For the uninitiated, as someone who’s looking to move from Windows to Linux and Ubuntu is probably my first choice, can you share what’s not to like about this?

      Edit - insightful answers. Thank you

      • carzian@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        For context:

        Snaps are a way to build applications so that they can run on any platform with one build method. It makes it easier for developers to publish their apps across multiple different Linux distro without having to worry about dependency issues.

        Snaps have been very poorly received by the community, one of the largest complaints is that a snap program with take 5-10 seconds to start, where as the same program without snap will start instantly.

        Ubuntu devs have been working for years to optimize them, but it’s a complex problem and while they’ve made some improvements, it’s slow going. While this has been going on, Ubuntu is slowly doubling down more and more on snaps, such as replacing default apps with their snap counterparts.

        On the other hand, other methods like flatpak exist, and are generally more liked by the community.

        This has led to a lot of Ubuntu users feeling unheard as their feedback is ignored.

      • BitingChaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Performance and functionality.

        When I click the Firefox icon, I expect Firefox to open. Like, right away.

        When Ubuntu switched it to a snap, there was a noticeable load time. I’d click the icon and wait. In the background the OS was mounting a snap as a virtual volume or something, and loading the sandboxed app from that. It turned my modern computer with SSD into an old computer with a HDD. Firefox gets frequent updates, so the snap would be updated frequently, requiring a remount/reload every update.

        Ubuntu tried this with many stock apps (like Calculator), but eventually rolled things back since so many people complained about the obvious performance issues.

        I’m talking about literally waiting 10X the time for something to load as a snap than it did compared to a “regular” app.

        The more apps you have as snaps, the more things have to be mounted/attached and slowly loaded. This also use to clutter up the output when listing mounted devices.

        The Micropolis (GPL SimCity) snap loads with read-only permissions. i.e., you cannot save. There are no permission controls for write access (its snap permissions are only for audio). Basically, the snap was configured wrong and you can never save your game.

        I had purged snapd from my system and added repos to get “normal” versions of software, but eventually some other package change would happen and snapd would get included with routine updates.

        I understand the benefits of something like Snaps and Flatpaks - but you cannot deny that there are negatives. I thought Linux was about choice. I’ve been administering a bunch of Ubuntu systems at work for well over a decade, and I don’t like what the platform has been becoming.

        Also, instead of going with an established solution (flatpak), Ubuntu decided to create a whole new problem (snap) and basically contributes to a splitting of the community. Which do you support? Which gets more developer focus to fix and improve things?

        You don’t have to take my word for any of this. A quick Google search will yield many similar complaints.

          • BitingChaos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh! I forgot another one! Updates.

            You can’t really control when the updates of snaps are rolled out.

            For “regular” software, I have an “apt update” type of script that I can run when I choose to update everything on my system. On some systems, I have this in a weekly crontab. On other systems, there is no scheduled run. On those systems, it’s important to keep many apps as-is - so several packages are also locked, as well (“apt-mark hold”).

            With snap, you basically have no control. It updates as many times as it wants, when it wants. You can try to adjust some timers to change the window when forced updates are rolled out, but can never tell it to NOT update something. Broken package updated? Well, you can manually roll back that one. Broken update pushed again during the next forced update window? Just roll it back again! (and repeat, every day)

            These are the words direct from a snap developer on why you cannot lock an app: “You need to keep your software up to date.

            Yes, I understand that, but I also know it’s really important to not update some stuff, and I know that broken snaps sometimes get pushed.

            Basically, the snap developers have talked down to the users. THEY know better of what WE actually want and need, not us dumb users that actually administer things for a living.

            • mustkana@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You basically have no control. It updates as many times as it wants, when it wants. You can try to adjust some timers to change the window when forced updates are rolled out, but can never tell it to NOT update something.

              This is incorrect:

              snap refresh --hold=forever

              In general, I’d advise you to do a bit of research beforehand when giving advice…

              Edit: Downvotes for factual information? Really?

              • Piranha Phish@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The --hold feature was introduced with snapd v2.58 which was released as recently as Dec 1, so less than 9 months ago. So I would consider this a relatively new feature.

                Furthermore, as best as I can tell from the documentation, there isn’t even a way to configurably hold updates in general or for a specific package like can be done with apt-preferences; refresh.hold only allows 90 days out.

                I think it is a perfectly valid criticism that the snap developers didn’t implement this feature at all until well into the life of the product and then, even then, done begrudgingly at best evidenced by the minimal implementation.

                Now, I feel like I did my research, but feel free to let me know if there’s something I can do better or if you have any other general life advice for me.

      • vettnerk@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        One word: snapd

        If you like the idea of ubuntu, but wish to avoid ubuntu, you might want to check out Linux Mint.

          • BitSound@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Also a great option. I like their tiling window manager and the other gnome extensions they’ve done. I’m also generally excited about the work they’re doing with Cosmic as a new DE.

  • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I spent the last 10 mins reading all the comments and I think we managed to shit on all the distros available.
    That’s the Linux community I love, good job people <3

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Haven’t seen Santoku or Kali or several other special use-case distros (E: or Hannah Montana Linux hahahaha). But, yes, this is exactly the community I love and that extreme hate/love for specific distros is the reason I tried Linux in the first place (and the reason I stayed) hahaha

    • Oliver Lowe@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s that pesky root user, right? There’s loads of their files on my system. I can’t edit any of them. Don’t know why they are so protective.

      • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Binary speed is really the least reason to use Gentoo.

        There are a lot of thorny issues in package distribution that source builds completely sidestep.

        Install-it-yourself plus source updates are a lot to ask, but if you can get the hang of it the benefits are pretty sweet.

    • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So what you’re actually saying is: you don’t like Arch because you don’t want to take the time to learn how to use Arch.

      (Which is fine)

        • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Fair. Though I will say (more for others who may see this in the future), that Arch’s new installer is great and definitely reduces the load on new users. That said, it’s never going to be explicitly designed for people who have no Linux experience.

    • Elw@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly… I don’t get this. It’s a bit more work than other distros but I think that Linux users often get to a point in their Linux journey where customizing a system with defaults is more difficult than just starting from a blank slate.

      • nik282000@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Customizing all-in-one distros is a shitty uphill battle that isn’t worth the trouble, so I get how Arch is worth the work there. But recommending a kit car when people are asking for a commuter just bugs me.

    • vettnerk@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ve always been intrigued by that one. I want to test it out, but finding an image has proven difficult.

  • iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ubuntu: broke my LTS 20 by upgrading to LTS 22, pushes snaps and other ridiculous things over the years while offering relatively little value these days

  • quantenzitrone@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Arch and any arch based distro. It’s overused, deb is better and the absolute chads will always be distros like NixOS or Guix System. There is no use for an unstable, beginner-unfriendly, distro where you constantly encounter dependency hell.

    Of course I’m just being edgy, every Linux Distro is good for the sole fact of it not being Windows.

    • vlad@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      IDK, when it comes to gaming I find it much easier to install all the weird community patches via AUR vs other distros. I’m on PopOS right now, but if I wanted to reinstall I’d go with Manjaro.

      It seems to be the best choice if you want the benefits of Arch but not have to install it manually, which I think is a needlessly difficult process. I wish they had a more bare bones version through. And I know about Arch’s autoinstall script. I’ve had bad luck with it.

      • Fisch@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wouldn’t recommend Manjaro, if you install anything from the AUR, there’s a good chance your system will just refuse to boot after an update someday (speaking from personal experince btw). I’d go with EndeavourOS instead, which is also arch based and makes the install super easy.

        • vlad@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I accept a certain level of volatility with my Linux experience. And I’ve not had any issues with AUR packages yet. I’ve been using a few Manjaro laptops for a while. But, that doesn’t mean that it can’t happen.

  • yum13241@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Manjaro, for its incompetence.

    I don’t hate Gentoo, but will never use it. I hate compiling.

    • Meseta@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure if I have bad luck but every time I’ve tried Ubuntu I’ve had stability issues. Constant crashes and things I’ve never run into in other distros.

      It makes it hard for me to recommend it to new users.

  • LeFantome@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Manjaro because it is a bait and switch trap. Seems really polished and user friendly. You will find out eventually it is a system destroying time-bomb and a poorly managed project.

    Ubuntu because snaps.

    The rest are all pros and cons that are different strokes for different folks.

    • moonsnotreal@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Every time I have used manjaro on x86 it has been broken within a few months. Their Raspberry Pi 4 port is pretty stable though for some reason.

  • mister_monster@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ubuntu, because of their shenanigans with ads in the OS, forcing snap and just generally demonstrating disdain for their userbase.

    Manjaro for their office suite debacle, and general instability.

    RHEL for their recent attempts to subvert GPL.

    Debian because packages are never, ever, ever up to date.

    Gentoo because any sane person would get sick of compiling.

    • vettnerk@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I actually like Gentoo for the same reason you hate it. But I was a FreeBSD guy for around 10 years before migrating to linux, and I probably some long lasting damage still lingering from that era.

      • pedro@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Damn I’m contemplating going to FreeBSD. What made you go the other way? What do you miss from FreeBSD?

        • vettnerk@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I miss /usr/ports. I could spend days just exploring its contents.

          I miss an /etc structure that wasn’t a complete mess.

          I miss UFS and its soft updates.

          I miss the stability of fBSD 3 and 4.

          I miss the ease of which you tweaked, compiled, and installed a new kernel.

          And just because of the hilarious legacy that was obsolete 20 years beforw I started with it, I miss the concept of font-servers.

          The main reason for my migration was the bigger userbase of linux where it was easier to find people who has resolved whatever issue I was having, plus nvidia drivers. Plus I’ve only needed to use fBSD once professionally.

  • Stillhart@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Garuda. It feels like being inside a gaming rig full of blinking RGB lights. Way over the top with the “gamer aesthetic”.

    • vettnerk@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same reason but different vibe with Kali for me. I’m sure it’s good for its intended purpose, but I get the feeling that there are many who install it in an attempt at being a kewl h4x0r. I used used Parrotsec for work for a while, and it’s a lot less flamboyant about it.

  • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ubuntu - It was my first distro and I loved it for many years after 6.06. However, it slowly shifted from a very community focused distro (“Linux for human beings” was the original slogan) to a very corporate distro with lots of in-house bullshit, CLAs, and partially-closed projects that seems to focus on profit and business over actual human beings. I correlate this move to around the time when it became purple rather than brown. Snap sucks, Mir sucks, Unity sucks, integrating Amazon and music store paid bullshit sucks. Just no. Move to Debian.

    Manjaro - It’s Arch, but with incompetence!

    Red Hat - Do you enjoy paying licensing fees for a Linux distro that very likely violates the open source licenses it uses? RHEL is for you! Just remember not to share the code! Sharing is most certainly NOT caring!

    • wim@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      How does Manjaro add incompetence? I’ve not used either for a while, buy Manjaro never failed me, while arch did manage to make my system nuke itself a couple times just running pacman -Syyu. Granted, this was a long time ago, but it’s the only distro to so this to me ever.

      • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The project maintainers repeatedly forget to renew their certificates, causing package upgrades to fail.

        The project maintainers, in multiple past instances, have misconfigured their package manager resulting in essentially a DDoS of the AUR.

        The packages are out of date vs. the upstream Arch ones, which often causes AUR packages intended for upstream Arch to break on Manjaro. Yet they consider the AUR a supported resource.

        Project has had problems with mismanagement of funds in the past.

        Despite all this, they seem to heavily focus on marketing, merch, and trying to sell preinstalled systems. Manjaro is in it for profit, not to make an awesome distro.

      • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If that were true then none of this would be news. The CentOS Stream code is available to the public on git, but not the RHEL code. If the RHEL code was available to the public the outrage would have no reason to exist.

        Even if paying customers have access to the RHEL code via git, they are forbidden from redistributing it (which is allowed by the FOSS licenses that code is under) or else the customers lose their license. This does not qualify as the code being available in my opinion, and in the opinion of the vast majority of the FOSS community.

        Saying everything is fine and dandy in the RHEL world is FUD.