Good for him, I hope he is ok
Aspiring polymath. Applied R&D @ Privacy and Scaling Explorations #maker #Ethereum🦇🔊🐼🐍🟨🦀 Trying to make the internet better. Opinions are my own and subject to change
Good for him, I hope he is ok
I don’t think you can
ARM is not paltry, it’s in small/portable devices because it’s efficient, not weak.
Which can be missed by an examiner
Very speculative
Zero knowledge and multi-party computation, and technologies that allow, like TLS Notary and proof of email
It’s federal, so 50% minimum. Also I think he pissed a lot of people off, I think he’s going to be in there a while
Sounds like corruption is playing a part in this
Nope rocm works great with open source drivers and is way better than it was 6 months to a year ago
So many people on Lemmy are pessimistic as shit, makes it hard to read the comments sometimes
Sounds like they need better background checks
I think they are doing this above board, so it’s just “contracts”. It’s not illegal, just shortsighted. Just like lobbying isn’t technically bribery because it’s “official bribery” so it’s got a different name.
I could think of a few dozen on the top of my head, but I imagine it’s one of those things that as the collective "me"s got used to it, we could probably all use an extra hand and it would quickly get into the hundreds
A lot. It would be quite a few just to fully get into the hobbies I have, and quite a lot more to pursue all the things I’d like to learn.
I ran /r/cryptotechnology for years, and am good friends with the /r/cc mods. Reddit is a mess though, especially in the crypto areas.
Fair point, I agree with this. There should probably be another icon in the browser that shows if all, some, or none of the media on a page has signatures that can be validated. Though that gets messy as well, because what is “media”? Things can be displayed in a web canvas or SVG that appears to be a regular image, when in reality it’s rendered on the fly.
Security and cryptography UX is hard. Good point, thanks for bringing that up! Btw, this is kind of my field.
The best way this could be handled is a green check mark near the video that you could click on it and it would give you all the meta data of the video (location, time, source, etc) with a digital signature (what would look like a random string of text) that you could click on and your browser would show you the chain of trust, where the signature came from, that it’s valid, probably the manufacturer of the equipment it was recorded on, etc.
And regulated and inspected for abuses of power
He might have been epsteined though