Of course true, just a dream 🥲

Yeah, when you’re going 90km/h, it’s fucking idiotic. It’s way too fucking close, you’re going to kill someone. Random brake check incoming!

There is no Firefox without people’s desire for privacy. There is no sufficient privacy without people removing the diseased fingerprint of multiple big companies.

There is no possibility of a big browser surviving, without caving to big companies, in the artificially hostile web created by Google’s monopoly.

And that last one is fundamentally unfair, beyond any accusation of “Derivative!” anyone can make.

I call this comment, the “58008’s Wild Ride”

My mental illness is a convenient side effect of society’s plan to literally weaken its populace for the sake of control and political stability 💕

(It’s the God one, just replacing God with the ruling class 🥰)

It’s better, because here the underlying pacing isn’t left ruined after the removal.

Removing the laugh track leaves behind (hilariously) awkward gaps.

That’s every company though

I mean, they didn’t bother you guys.

The guy was just cold, and the gal had a personal moment. Not their fault, that you two little kids were scared of strangers.

Kidding aside, and assuming what you’ve written is neither internet-talk nor standard schizophrenia tendencies, it might be carbon monoxide poisoning. It was a phenomenon, with haunted houses very often just having faulty heaters of some kind, causing hallucinations in the right doses.

Sure, no objections there

So, to condense the article:

Opinion:

You can legally kill anyone related to someone who has had Disney+.

Iirc, the wife died, the husband sued, and they tried to say the husband can’t sue because HE had had the subscription a long time ago.

Each subscriber loses the right to sue for any of their loved ones.

After all, if they’re dead, they can’t sue you anyway

Lol

A record of records

Oh no. I guess the only reasonable response is to bomb another children’s hospital.

The Guardian has dropped the ball a bunch of times.

A non-name media org is less likely to be a target for rich fucks who want to pay to push their agenda through a big, recognizable, reputable source.

The bigger the organisation, the greater the chances it will be corrupted, in ways big and small, by rich fucks.

No longer a mathematical problem, but determine the largest piece that can be removed, before it becomes apparent to onlookers that the leftover pizza has been tampered with.

Remember the premise, cheating is lying about the situation, and acting on those needs without consent.

There is no world where that is healthier than whatever mutual agreement the couple could end up in, after honestly sharing their situation.

If the care for the needs of the child is real and actually shared between the parents, anything ranging from a sexually open marriage, to a divorce with uninterrupted coparenting, is leagues better than pretending you want to be there while actually both having a bad time around your child’s other parent, and constantly lying.

If you don’t care about a relationship, the other person still might, and them being hurt should matter to you.

End the relationship since you don’t care about it anyways, to let the other person move on with the least lies and sense of betrayal, and then fuck everyone you wish.

Cheating isn’t a way to end a relationship, cheating is lying in order to keep it longer.

God damn acab I swear

… Yeah it is 🫠🥲

In literal terms it translates to “before-the-road” (pro - drómou)

(this literal translation includes the ambiguity of before- as in ‘temporally before’, or before- as in ‘in front of’)

So any way you slice it, it’s pretty ironic.

“Prodromou” is a Greek surname, with the rough meaning “the one who walks the road before others”.

So him being “a visionary” is fun, lol