It isn’t always that they don’t know what they want, sometimes they just don’t know how to describe what they want, or they may know what they don’t want.
It isn’t always that they don’t know what they want, sometimes they just don’t know how to describe what they want, or they may know what they don’t want.
From what I could find, she isn’t eligible to run until she is 35. https://www.usa.gov/requirements-for-presidential-candidates#:~:text=The U.S. Constitution states that,United States for 14 years
That says anyone who meets the requirements can declare their candidacy.
Ooooh, now plot the avg wage across this period. Y=min wage.
Video shows three new origins plus the ability to have non-gestalt consciousness. New megastructures.
The 17th amendment tells them to eat shit. Not sure how they plan to write that legislation so it won’t be found unconstitutional.
I would prefer it to be opt in, instead of opt out. Maybe the centralized opt out won’t be as toothless as the do not call list.
Thank you both for a positive example of challenging someone’s post.