This implies that people care, which might not be true…

Macron is definitely not a centrist. He’s a rightoid like most other French presidents.

He can’t be re-elected, and failed to secure an actual legacy.

Politics aren’t a game with winners and losers. When fascists rise to power, it’s not like in a soccer game where you say “well, better luck next year”.

People’s lives are on the line, and people might literally die fighting this shit soon. The idea that politics are a gentleman’s gentle verbal jousting club is pretty ridiculous.

About your enlightened centrist take about immigration… It’s never going to appease racists. What you suggest is exactly what France’s UMP and what Macron have done. Look where we are now.

I have honestly stopped buying tortillas when I learnt how crappy industrial tortillas are. I had no idea before that.

Il y a beaucoup de gens habitués au Français international qui résident sur l’île, je me demande si ça influe.

J’ai surpris des québecois dire “putain” ou “du coup”, c’était drôle 😁

(Scott Pilgrim vs the world, in case you’re wondering)

As the person who replied to you rightfully said, the persons you decry are mostly French, you said so yourself. The people you want to be “locked out” of the country cannot be deported - which country would they go to if they’re French and French only?

Your original point is wrong. Controlling immigration will do nothing to solve the insecurity RN voters perceive, because the North Africans they hate so much will still remain in France.

That was close enough!

It’s less confusing if you think of 70 and 90 as separate words without trying to analyze what their constituting words mean.

But etymologically, sure, it makes no sense.

Cinq

Fuck the guardian for lumping together fascists with leftist movements.

That, and their leverage is pretty weak. Small dogs bark the loudest.

Are they not a ChatGPT troll account or a bot?

This is an ironic ChatGPT answer, meant to (rightfully) creep you out.

Balzac = Ballsack

I’ll check OpenUI, thanks for the suggestion

Touché

Show me proof or shut up. It’s that simple. This is not a subjective matter like wine tasting. There needs to be objective and tangible proof it works.

Hyperbole again.

I don’t care about the edge of that tech. I’m not interested in investing any time making it work. This is your problem. I need a product I can use as a consumer. Which doesn’t exist, and may never exist because the core of the tech alone is unsound.

You guys make grandiloquent claims that this will automate software engineering and be everywhere more generally. Show us proof. What we’ve seen so far is ChatGPT (lol), Air Canada’s failures to create working AI chatbots (lol), a creepy plushie and now this shitty device. Skepticism is rationalism in this case.

Maybe this will change one day? IDK. All I’ve been saying is that it’s not ready yet from what I’ve seen (prove me wrong with concrete examples in the software engineering domain) and given that it tends to invent stuff that just doesn’t exist, it’s unreliable. If it succeeds, LLMs will be part of a whole delivering value.

You guys sound like Jehovah’s witnesses. get a hold of yourselves if you want to be taken seriously. All I see here is hyperbole from tech bros without any proof.