(Which is correct so there’s nothing wrong with that)

One full tank of gas on your motorcycle could be enough for a lifetime…

It turns into a checkmark as soon as you have the song in your playlists. For new songs, its just a plus button (at least for me)

Killing and enslaving should not be allowed and should be avoided at all cost.

The point is, however, if (lets say) a communist killed and enslaved people, should that mean that communist views should be censored in the future? (No! IMO)

Killing and enslaving people are terrible and unacceptable ways of pushing one’s own ideals. It does not make the actual opinion itself invalid though.

Killing and enslaving are both means to do something, not the actual reason itself. If any person with a different political view wanted to do the same, it would be just as bad. Everyones opinion should be allowed.

Measuring quantun superpositions can have different outcomes under the same circumstances, right? So therefore, it cannot be deterministic (= what you described) because randomness is involved.

If you say you are right to censor your worst enemys then the Nazis were logically also right to censor the opinions of the people THEY hated the most…

Supporting only certain peoples freedom of speech is the definition of censorship…

Arent there any monthly/yearly tickets?

TOR and VPN at once is just dumb and probably less secure than just using TOR.

capitalism has them pay to be an inventor

I live in a capitalist country with free education. Healthcare is free if you cant afford it and is always a percentage of your income otherwise. Housing and food is also free if you cant afford it.

I have trouble seeing why capitalism is supposedly so bad

Inventor: invents something Capitalism: rewards him

Inventor: invents something communism: *cricket noises"

No

That TECHNICALLY doesnt answer the question because he didnt ask what you know, he asked what the next numbers are.

Whats your point? I explained why I find capitalism to be a fair system and further elaborated on what I concidered “fair”. What are you trying to say or are you just trolling?

You can do what you like but you asked me how to get people working for you so I made a proposal.

Do you actually have a point or are you just being ridiculous because you have no arguments?

But how am I gonna get someone to work for me without invading their freedom to choose to do what they want?

By offering them something in return…? Money for example, from which one can buy nice things.

That’s how we do it! That’s what gets people working for me - the threat that not doing so will put 'em on the street!

Not contributing anything at all wont work in any system or sosciety. Or in what system can I lay in bed all day and get everything I need for free?

Fairness is subjective. To me it means: everyone is free to do what they like WITHOUT invading anybody elses freedom; if a person performs well, they should be rewarded well; everyone should have the same initial possibilities in life.

The version of capitalism I was talking about is capitalism with a regulated market. Basic needs should be covered (except if you refuse to contributr anything at all). Im pretty happy with the “social market economy” in Germany where I currently live.

Why not? Capitalism is the most fair system to me.

This was on a different level though. Taking civilian hostages? Launching rockets with the target being a music festival?

One group took 2 years to organize an attack on civilians, the other didnt…