In a sense, money represents all the future goods and services it can buy, and those goods and services ultimately resolve down to someone’s time and effort. Money was conceived as a formalization of IOU’s, after all.

So it’s similar to asking whether there’s a limit to how much time and effort from (i.e. influence over) others one would want.

Must be proprietary, bc TOTP shouldn’t be blocked by age of the device

What are the numbers for?

speed up certain types of applications as long as application providers don’t have to pay for special treatment

Maybe they mean by doing things like giving slight priority to real-time application traffic like VOIP over streaming over websites vs file transfers, like how home routers can?

Don’t think that should be something to charge people more for, though. They’re not even able to deliver on their own advertised speeds.

If talking about a closed source app, their whole goal is to move off of hosting closed source systems.

Article says the decision follows a successful pilot project, so they’re willing to absorb the short term costs. Optimistically in the long run, the symbiotic benefits of having a government entity using and supporting a full FOSS system will be huge.

What do you do for a living/what are you into that isn’t super deep in some way? What field did you rabbit hole into in the past that makes you go, “never again”, now?

I think people are being lazy, in a selfish, tragedy of the commons sort of way.

When standing in line, they all watch the customer stand there doing nothing as the cashier checks out items. If only they’d bag their own things, we’d all be able to get on with our lives that much sooner. Instead, they continue standing there doing nothing, as the cashier now bags their items.

Then the next person in line moves up and also just stands there, also unwilling to do anything to help speed things along.

Oh, interesting

Hell of a frame budget to work by, but I don’t know much about game programming

You can, once you find a game that runs at 1k fps

Pretty spiteful of you

In the long run, nearly the same effect as 100% inheritance tax anyways.

The government won’t know the cash has been removed from the economy, but it’ll have been removed all the same.

It’s difficult to consider them pollution even if we were to accept the subjective opinion on displeasing aesthetics.

The pollution we’re all concerned about tends to be:

• Physically harmful
• Difficult to confine/localize/avoid/reverse
• An externality the economy doesn’t sufficiently account for
• A burden that’s unevenly/unfairly distributed across society

Even light pollution, which is arguably barely physically harmful, has all of the remaining qualities (or nearly) for sure.

If these qualities even apply wind generators at all, they do so very weakly. They can be moved/unbuilt, the “free market” is pricing them cheaper by the day, and if you really don’t like looking at them, it’s not impractical to avoid them.

Technically, anything can be “hacked”, but that’s the same kind of technically as “any car can be broken into”.

Just like there are ways to mitigate getting your car broken into, there are ways to mitigate getting your system compromised.

deleted by creator