

HTML doesn’t “run”. It’s not a scripting language, it’s a markup language. All it does is mark sections of the document for the browser to display.
I like American music. Do you like American music? I like American music, too.
Other versions of me:
HTML doesn’t “run”. It’s not a scripting language, it’s a markup language. All it does is mark sections of the document for the browser to display.
CSS is the rules for how to display the marked-up document. Even when CSS is not defined for a document, the default stylesheet of the browser is used. It’s not an interpreted language.
well, a markup language, not necessarily hypertext markup language
I used to not use a case, because I had a ruggedized hiking phone that didn’t need one.
I tend to think the the obligation to action falls more heavily on the privileged. Those who aren’t marginalized have a duty to use their position to correct the injustices.
No more often than I eat meat now, which is only as often as I have to not be rude.
The price of meat is currently artificially lowered by several factors, including government subsidies and lax regulations. Correcting that would be good for everyone, even if it made meat a “sometimes” food for everyone but the rich.
wrong domain?
You got it in one. Gravity isn’t fast enough.
My 1880 foursquare.
Invisible deity? The observers are you and me.
You started this thread with hostility and rudeness, what exactly did you expect?
But they are acting like assholes when they say things like “trans hysteria”. Combative and dismissive behavior is jerk behavior, so if you don’t want people to call you one, don’t act like one.
I did consider it in that light. This analysis is from the perspective of an observer, not the presiding body. Since the presiding body’s reasoning cannot be known, we observers just look for patterns of removal to determine whether censorship is occurring. These are the pattern-markers I look for.
“Dead” is an adjective, modifying the antecedent of “he”, not an adverb modifying “is”.
Contrast “he is well”, where “well” modifies “is” as an adverb vs. “he is good” where “good” is an adjective modifying “he”. There’s no grammatic signifier which is which beyond the modifying word itself, so you need to see whether it’s in adverb form or adjective form.
“he died” describes an action
“he was dead” describes a condition / state / quality
I’d abandon the growth mindset as actively hostile to both society and the environment and instead focus on quality, efficiency, and sustainability.
The best defense is avoidance. To that end, a personal time-travel / prognostication device that could both predict danger and chronoport you back to before danger was imminent would be the ultimate defense, though suppose not strictly a “weapon”.
I think I used an Apple ][ through the gifted program before we got a used Commodore 64 at home, but I spent more time on the C64. Taught myself to type and to program in BASIC.