![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
When I wonder what heaven is like I imagine going a day without thinking about this Elon Musk motherfucker, then I imagine doing that every day forever and I feel a little closer to Jeebus.
When I wonder what heaven is like I imagine going a day without thinking about this Elon Musk motherfucker, then I imagine doing that every day forever and I feel a little closer to Jeebus.
This site counted and “The conclusion was that with 19 black characters over seven seasons, Dukes of Hazzard had a higher black-character-to-episode ratio than Seinfeld or Friends.”
If the owner improves the home and the appraisal goes up, wouldn’t rent go up?
The renter pays extra and receives part ownership. So the owner receives this extra money and… just has to keep the money on hand in case the renter leaves years down the road?
The whole thing is a legal nightmare. Owners would just sell. And who would buy? Corporate landlords who have lawyers who can cut through all this confusion.
That’s how they get ya
Why only the one half? What if I want the other half?
Or The Peacemaker. He killed a lot of Russians in that movie
As someone who just bought a 10-pack of Oscar Meyer hot dogs at the grocery store for $3.29, I had to click. The article is about hot dogs at sport stadiums. Frankly, I’m surprised they aren’t more expensive seeing as how venues price things astronomically high.
I would have gone with you to the end, into the very fires of Mordor you piece of shit
Look, Mike Johnson is an innocent hard working man who saw a large group of morally corrupt assholes who won’t do anything unless it makes the life of a woman, child or minority worse in some way and said “Hey, I’d like to be the head asshole of this group.” I think he deserves some respect.
/s
I botched that post, especially the first sentence. I meant to say that it relies on human life being real at some point, either in the present or in the past, and doesn’t really rule out alien life at that point
Bostrom’s theory relies on life being real too. If I could rephrase it, his theory is:
1 if humans can simulate a human mind in the future, they will 2 they will probably simulate their ancestors (us) 3 they will probably do it trillions and trillions of times 4 this means that out of trillions of consciousnesses, some are real humans and some are simulations 5 we are either one of the few billion actual living minds or one of the trillions of simulated minds and math says it’s the latter because trillions is more. (He never says trillions, just unspecific words like “countless”)
I think Bostrom is genius but I’ve never found this argument very interesting.
Is this you?
Meanwhile, Daddy was bragging on truth social that he had $500 million in cash a couple days ago
It’s not on the list but I always wanted to be a knocker-upper
Yes, you can live off of 16 per shift, but if you really want to get ahead you’ll work extra hours and exchange those extra hash browns for goods and services
48 hash browns per day is way more than anyone needs
Ok I think I get where you’re coming from. It’s membership in the nation group that makes it genocide. But that would make almost all war genocide. We could think that but it kinda takes away all meaning. If all war is genocide then no war is genocide.
It also ignores the second part of the definition, “with the aim of destroying that nation or group.” That is a basic Google/dictionary definition and it’s not bad but the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide defined it as “…acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.”
First, there has to be intent. Second, “as such” means destroying the group so much that it is no longer a group.
US law isn’t applicable but it is a little more clear.
USC 1091 defines genocide as “…specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such.”
USC 1093 defines the term “substantial part” to mean: “a part of a group of such numerical significance that the destruction or loss of that part would cause the destruction of the group as a viable entity within the nation of which such group is a part.”
I believe they’re both saying “destroy the group so hard it is no longer a viable group.”
If nation group is the gauge, the question is: During WWII, did the US intend to destroy Germans so thoroughly that there was no longer a Germany? Did the US intend to destroy Iraqis so thoroughly that there ceased to be an entity called Iraq?
No to both of those.
Ba’athists aren’t a nation or ethnic group either.
I love that movie. The way they run with blades is so good