I haven’t developed anything with #ActivityPub, but have read a little bit of the spec. I would love to hear the take from developers making use of it.

(Sorry for the mention in any case)

@[email protected]

@[email protected]

@[email protected]

@[email protected]

No, I kept going back to this one, but thankfully someone (@[email protected]) found it. Thanks nevertheless.

Thank you so much!

Yeah, it sucks. But I think that at a certain point it will need to happen if we want to make ActivityPub better with better portability.

I think there’s a FEP that could (or fixes) this. To my understanding ID can be any URI, so there are better ways. I guess it’s hard because it would brake a lot of stuff or how mastodon is build.

For a second I thought the ActivityPub specification got updated.

Literally one of the reason for the existence of this thread.