Thanks!

From April 2026, a 20% tax rate – half the headline inheritance tax rate of 40% – will be applied to the value of farms and businesses worth more than £1m when they are passed on.

I think this is what they are complaining about.

I’d guess the codebase that keeps Word running is so convoluted by now they have trouble shoehorning it in.

Ok, what film is this from?

Could country A try to decrease exports to country B and increase exports to country C, D, and E, perhaps by lowering the cost in C, D, and E?

I don’t have any evidence for, and this document is just too long for me to read at this late hour. [IMF - Macroeconomic Consequences of Tariffs](Macroeconomic Consequences of Tariffs. https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/WP/2019/wp1909.ashx)

Interesting question, and as lots have already commented, judges are possibly biased to whoever keeps them in power.

Perhaps a lottery amongst the pool of potential judges (lawyers or whoever it may be)

Careful, you’ve gone so far down the maze you’ll need a trail of breadcrumbs to find your way back

Excellent choice! In my vague memories it was an original game with a fun theme

Black & White 2 gets my vote

I didn’t remember this specific incidence, but the govt. / media do like to blame that darn rock music, mini skirts, Doom game, horror movie for all the bad things that are happening.

Also, link to this specific incidence https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_Rose#Controversy

In Sync for Lemmy app, open the post so you can see the comments, then click on the image for both resolution readability.

Sounds really good, will have to give this a try

So the mosquitoes just agreed not to cross the border 🦟

I’m pretty sure they did.

Six months after he was first sent to fight, he was struggling with post-traumatic stress disorder […] Before he was due to redeploy, he took his own life.

The name is British, the fine is dollars ($), so could be a lot of places …

However, the effect of vitamin and mineral supplements on the risk of non-communicable diseases in “generally healthy” populations is controversial. We examine patterns of supplement use and the evidence on their effects from randomised trials.

to date, randomised trials have largely shown no benefit of vitamin, mineral, and fish oil supplements on the risk of major non-communicable diseases in people without clinical nutritional deficiency. These results contrast with findings from observational studies, where supplemental nutrient intakes are often associated with a reduced risk of these diseases. The apparent associations from observational studies may result from unknown or unmeasured confounding factors such as socioeconomic status and lifestyle factors, including a better overall diet

https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m2511

Their use as general ‘pick-me-ups’ is of unproven value and, in the case of preparations containing vitamin A or D, may actually be harmful if patients take more than the prescribed dose.

https://bnf.nice.org.uk/treatment-summaries/vitamins/

As previously stated there is evidence for and against.

In conclusion, multivitamins were found to enhance immediate free recall memory but no other cognitive domains.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=benefits+of+multivitamins&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1729284229951&u=%23p%3DJVQ1iRSCrVoJ

Neuhouser et al (14) recently provided an excellent summary of observational and clinical trial data on dietary supplements in relation to cancer. For MVM supplements, case-control studies of cancer at various sites (eg, colon, esophagus, stomach, oropharynx, breast, cervix, bladder, prostate, and skin) suggested that benefits may exceed risks. Corresponding cohort study results, however, were mostly consistent with no association

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002916523279101

Conclusion In this large prevention trial of male physicians, daily multivitamin supplementation modestly but significantly reduced the risk of total cancer.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/1380451

I was highlighting the fact that there’s evidence for both answers

Removed by mod

A lateral flow test or something using a lab?

Must be a lab test as lateral flow is like £2:
https://www.boots.com/flowflex-antigen-rapid-test-lateral-flow-self-testing-kit-1-test-10312288

Or $7 in Walmart: https://www.walmart.com/ip/Flowflex-Covid-19-Antigen-Home-Test-1-Test/837992467?classType=VARIANT&athbdg=L1200