We heard you like Windows apps…
We heard you like Windows apps…
Look at Samsung’s history. This is their MO, it’s how they became the Samsung we know today - straight up steal actual product designs, not just concepts, not just copy closely, a compete steal, and sell until arrested.
Search “samsung employees swallow evidence”
Fun times.
This is a great video, love this one, thanks for sharing!
If everyone has another 20 minutes, John Oliver delves into the topic some more.
We should still try to recycle as member of our community (and the world populace) but it’s the corporations that need to be held accountable and forced to take action. Because as it stands now they are lobbying hard to shift the blame to consumers and make it difficult to ban single use products, while also avoiding packaging innovations and laws that promote such change - 'cause, you know…profits.
That’s actually a good question. Surely Mastodon and Lemmy instances should have also seen an uptick in registrations?
That…uhh… that sounds…
Yes, it is very unpleasant.
Just out of curiosity, are you an Apple user, looking for alternatives to Apple’s AppStore?
WD, in turn, claimed the firm had not infringed Suess’ patents
So did they or didn’t they infringe? The article doesn’t say. I imagine MRT disassembled some drives to examine for infringement.
It is also possible that these hundreds of employees across the globe working R&D for Western Digital may have developed the same, or nearly the same, technology. But then MRT filed first if they were awarded the patient.
Given the track record of memory and other computer parts manufactures, I would say it’s more likely that they’re simply lying through their teeth.
No, I think it’s, maybe, a little bit different. So, I’ve known him a long time indirectly, not directly very much, and he was always of white heritage, and he was only promoting white heritage, I didn’t know he was orange, until a number of years ago when he happened to turn orange, and now he wants to be known as orange. So, I don’t know, is he white or is he orange - but, you know what, I respect either one
Notable Communist Governments and Their Human Rights Records:
Soviet Union (1922 - 1991)
China (1949 - Present)
Cuba (1959 - Present)
North Korea (1948 - Present)
Vietnam (1976 - Present)
Laos (1975 - Present)
References: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/human-rights-index-vdem
https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2020/country-chapters/global
https://www.discoverwalks.com/blog/world/the-25-most-influential-communist-figures-of-all-time/
https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-seven-most-influential-communist-leaders-ever.html
https://www.thoughtco.com/communist-countries-overview-1435178
https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/communism/
History isn’t propaganda
Always cracks me up to see people who champion open source alternatives hate on communism.
This isn’t about “drawing comparisons” this is about how you don’t understand why someone would champion open source software and hate on communism…because of course people hate on fucking communism, you dope.
It’s proven time and time again that communist governments bring suffering to their people. Like, some fucked up shit. Like starvation, inequality, and lack of basic human rights.
Whereas open source software can be educational, build cost effective solutions for people and businesses, and empower people’s lives.
You see the difference?
make millions of people felons overnight
Also wrong. I knew you were going to spout some far right bullshit propaganda.
Here, take some time to educate yourself.
Listen up people - it is okay to evolve our laws as we evolve as people. No one needs a fucking AR-15, and if you do, it should be regulated.
…JFC
You shouldn’t feel that way, because communism has absolutely nothing to do with open source software.
Communism is a political ideology.
Open source software is a licensing technique for creators and developers. Mostly so that no one has to worry about getting sued if they want to implement or modify said software. You think a communist government would even allow the use of open source software over government issued/approved software?
Yeah, but you’re also wrong about the gun rights. They’re trying to enact sensible laws, not strip gun rights.
The most [egregious] recent example is the legality of arm braces.
It’s not egregious, that’s called a sensible conversation.
Why do gun fanatics need these types of guns anyway? What are you hunting, dragons? It’s so cringe to me when gun enthusiasts get all upset about responsible gun laws - they just want to shoot everything and anything with the most firepower they can acquire. God forbid they have to earn the right to own such a weapon.
Democrats believe that we can reduce gun violence while respecting the rights of responsible gun owners. We believe we should expand and strengthen background checks for those who want to purchase a firearm – because it shouldn’t be easier to get a gun than a driver’s license.
That is not taking your precious guns away, it’s requiring you to not be a complete moron before acquiring one. Which is apparently why you have a problem with the proposal.
Yes. You need a reference when you’re talking pure bullshit. None of that unfounded crap is on the democratic agenda. That’s why you can’t cite a single reference.
Bullshit like yours needs to be called out every time.
Why don’t you cite one reference to support your bullshit?
To bear arms.
No they’re not.
Also nobody seems interested in male reproductive rights.
Okay, I’ll bite. Like what?
Also, have you seen how leftist moderators here on Lemmy behave?
Do tell…
I know you mean democrats, but that would be incorrect about the second amendment and freedom of association.
Where’d you read that?
Yeah, let’s believe in what that guy says./s What a dumb book.