• 0 Posts
  • 63 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 30th, 2023

help-circle

  • Similar experience seeing Ghost in de Vooruit in Ghent. Must’ve been 2016, back when they were called Ghost BC. Don’t really follow them much anymore, but that venue was on fire.

    Edit - Also amazing:

    • Florence and the machine: amazing voice
    • Ocean Wisdom: whole club bouncing up and down
    • Macklemore: creates a rarely seen vibe with everyone
    • Cypress Hill: such legends even after all these years
    • Hooverphonic: insane voice and they are sometimes guided by an orchestra, so much power
    • Parov Stelar: with an orchestra as well and my god it’s really something to experience live

    A lot of artists sound way different live, I’ve been disappointed as well but these definitely stand out.











  • kernelle@0d.gstoMemes@lemmy.mlGlad this is becoming a meme
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The existing legal precedence

    I know that’s how law works, but there is no precedent for AI at this scale and will only get worse. What if AI gains full sentience? Are they a legally recognised person? Do they have rights and do they not own the copyright themselves? All very good questions with no precedent in law.



  • kernelle@0d.gstoMemes@lemmy.mlGlad this is becoming a meme
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ll compare it with the recent takedown of the Switch emulator Yuzu. It’s my understanding they actively solicited donations and piracy, both of which could be seen as commercial activities. Which in a project of that scale the latter was their downfall, meanwhile Ryujinx is still up and running. But we’ll see if that remains true.



  • kernelle@0d.gstoMemes@lemmy.mlGlad this is becoming a meme
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not necessarily, if a model is public domain, there could still be a lot of proprietary elements used in interpreting that model and actually running it. If you own the hardware and generate something using AI, I’d say the copyright goes to you. You use AI as the brush to paint your painting and the painting belongs to you, but if a company allows you to use their canvas and their painting tools, it should go to them.


  • Great articles, first is one of the best I’ve read about the implications of fair use. I argue that because of the broadness of human knowledge that is interpreted through these models, everyone is entitled to have unrestricted access to them (not the servers or algorithms used, the models). I’ll dub it “the library of the digital age” argument.


  • kernelle@0d.gstoMemes@lemmy.mlGlad this is becoming a meme
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Publicly available data” - I wonder if that includes Disney’s catalogue? Or Nintendo’s IP? I think they are veeery selective about their “Publicly available data”, it also implies the only requirement for such training data is that it is publicly available, which almost every piece of media ever? How an AI model isn’t public domain by default baffles me.