The definition as “involuntary celibate” is mostly used by the community whence the word comes… 4channers. Everywhere else, it has come to refer to the ideology of those who came up with it. Basically, misogynists who blame society, and particularly feminism for allegedly creating a world where it’s harder for them to get laid, and harder still to get a subservient housewife.

Oh I didn’t know Seal had lupus, but he’s awesome!

I want a second opinion!

What’s wrong with me?

DUMBLEDORE!

Don’t call me Shirley.

Did you think they were called that because they were hedging the hog? No, they’re hogging the hedge.

Thank you fellow netizen! I’m a hacker now! :D

Hello world! Where is the website with all the funny image? And where’s the one where you learn how to be a super hacker?

Maybe he needs a visit from Consent Santa?

This is something the US considered doing too. Talibans have a big conflict against the Islamic State in Khorasan. (source)

drn

The fatso didn’t leave the house, but ate it from whithin.

Monkeys could probably made to drink coffee. It’d be easier to have them drink iced coffee, since hot drinks are further from their habits, but hot coffee might not be out of the question either with enough patience and the right conditioning.

Monkeys could probably be made addict to caffeine. They probably shouldn’t tho.

And they would’ve gotten away with it if it wasn’t for you meddling kid!

Karma police, arrest this man!

How does it compare to sigma tho?

The controversial part is equating “centrist” to “least biased”. Being a centrist is a political position, and like all others, it comes with its share of bias.

Beside, the “center” views depend in the country, year, and even on who you ask. A man can go from right wing to center to left without changing his stance on anything if the countries politics shift right, and the reverse is true. There were right-wing communists in the USSR, tho they were not right wing by capitalist standards.

There are objective ways to judge a news outlet: Whether they name their sources, whether they’ve been known to post updates and errata when an info they’ve posted turned out wrong, whether they’re independent, state-funded or dependent on a company, and in the two later cases, are the state or company known to make use of their influence on the news…

And the website quoted by the bot accounts for some of these… But political positioning, while worth mentioning, shouldn’t be used to calculate the reliability of an outlet. Doing so doesn’t fight bias, but just favors some bias over others.

Have a day.

Yes, we finally made a monkey!