This is a false equivalency. The NYT has historically been complicit in manufacturing consent for US foreign policy interests with coverage framing and agenda-setting. By choosing what stories to cover and how to cover them, they can promote certain perspectives while downplaying others. Another user in this thread already pointed out that the author of this article is a pro-Israel propagandist.

Oh look, the NYT manufacturing consent for the military industrial complex. What a surprise.

“”“externalities”“”

I’ve been very happy with duckduckgo.