Yahoo brought the company that hosted my email back then when they had plenty of money, and I never had a reason to stop using it.

I also have a gmail, that is completely unusable compared to it. And an email in a domain registered to me. But from those 3, the only one I don’t use regularly is the gmail.

• There used to be dozens of theaters in a city, each one with a different set of contracts playing a different set of movies. Nowadays there are hundreds of movies in a city, all of them with the same set of contracts playing the same 5 movies.

• Yes, everything is too expensive, what means nobody can afford to take a risk. Not the public, not the theaters, not the studios. (You can see people on this thread commenting that they won’t.)

• There are what? 3 movie studios nowadays? Or are those 2? Either way, you can’t expect diversity from that.

If it had a definition, it wouldn’t be nonsense, would it?

“Trickle down economics” is a rhetoric instrument by which people try to convince the public that taxing poor people and fiscally spending in rich people will increase the poor people’s quality of life.

What the OP said means literally that if mass murdering people is legal, people will inevitably murder whoever makes the law and helps on that mass murdering. (What is not a universal law, but as sociology predictions go, is quite reliable.)

It’s not a hard concept to understand. Also, it has a very distant relation to morality or legality.

Yeah, that one is officially not from him.

And the police has been officially never wrong about it, and has been looking for that one guy to interrogate only, maybe ask where he brought his jacket or something like that.

The point is that the CEO wasn’t in jail for murder, was he?

What other options his victims had?

Their timing was perfect. It was just around the time when “you” started losing all the power all over the internet.

If you are asking this seriously, trickle-down economics is an absurd nonsense theory, there are no examples of it.

Also, money changing hands is not what creates wealth, and those security details would be just an artificially maintained middle-class that can never be large.

I’ve got some really good pizzas with pineapple on them, and some really bad pizzas with pineapple on them. Also, there used to be a place nearby that made a really good hamburger with pineapple in it.

Overall, it’s not the existence of pineapples that make food good or bad.

Hum… They just got a device for excluding the president’s party from the legislative process?

There is an optimum size, and going above it is almost as bad as going bellow. (But larger homes don’t get bad as quickly as smaller.)

What, they weren’t recommending encrypted communication before?

It’s afraid because the space-nazis (on your image) are successfully exterminating their species.

OMG, that meme! do you have any idea what is the context?

Well, explaining the noise is a game that can be played here too…

Everybody seems intent on doing it, why not us?

You have to love getting money more than any other thing.

Or, at least you have to love the things you need to do to get money. What given the things those people do, is even worse.

They’ve made a point to add seat-belts recently.

But people are still insisting they screw all the benches down. They already put an end on this discussion, saying that’s not an option, but people won’t shut-up about it…

Oh, that’s right. Yes, the graph is only bad and not wrong.

The tax is never negative. Instead, it plots a progressive tax rate, and calls it “negative”.

The second graph is just confusing and detracts from the explanation instead of adding to it.

What a bad set of graphs! The first one is just wrong.