Your hormones are out of whack. Get yourself tested. It’s not expensive and unaddressed endocrine problems are really shitty.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Now I know you didn’t think this response through. A nation isn’t a country? Tut tut.

Read that opening paragraph you quoted. It says nothing about Israel. It is an abstract moral rule. You ask yourself, “am I making a decision that will result in the deaths of more children?” If the answer is yes, you are making the wrong decision.

But let’s not pretend you read books.

deleted by creator

A person makes a decision. If that decision is almost certainly going to result in the deaths of children, it is the wrong decision. You will never face a simpler moral scenario than this.

People can argue about justifications in good faith, of course… although ironically in this case, we can’t even do that, since we both know that bombing Gaza does nothing to ameliorate the conflict and everything to exacerbate it.

Also, this isn’t a war. Wars are fought between nations, and Israel does not recognize Palestine’s sovereignty. Gaza has no self-determination. There’s no government. It is a prison full of children. An abomination for which no civilian living in Gaza bears any responsibility.

Lastly, nations don’t have rights. Nations are imaginary political constructs. People have rights, such as to defend themselves, as you say. However, bombing Gaza not only undermines Israel’s sovereignty by inciting an entire new generation of revulsion and hatred, it violates the rights of children not to be blown to bits. None of this is complex. None of it is morally ambiguous.

As for those “Western allies” you mentioned: you don’t have any. The religious boomers are on their way out, and nobody with half a brain or under the age of 40 supports Israel here in the West. They did this to themselves by slaughtering thousands of children utterly pointlessly. I mean what do you expect?

Lastly, religion is a monstrous evil. If you’re religious, please stop. Please.

They convicted the guy for wearing black, because apparently that meant that he was part of a larger “conspiracy” for violence in which he didn’t even participate. US courts continue to be an embarrassment to jurisprudence.

Killing children is bad: this is not something over which genuine disagreement could possibly arise.

I mean, aren’t we literally against Hamas because they kill children? What is so complex about being consistent with the application of your moral rules?

deleted by creator

Yes, do we have cause to be against genocide or don’t we? This one is tough. I mean the merits of genocide are obvious but there are drawbacks, too. Those pesky academics can’t see the bigger picture.

Or, generally when students and academics at the world’s top universities start protesting, shit is fucked.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Democracy is many things, but an automatic defense of cults and child abuse it is not.

Using liberal democracy to defend religious indoctrination is like using feminism to defend stoning. Which, btw, is also happening as a consequence of religion.

All religious indoctrination of children should be illegal. The concept of a “religious school” is oxymoronic.

I got banned from reddit for a year for commenting the word “good” under the announcement that the Queen was dead.

Removed by mod