• rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Ehh, i’m not giving France a pass either.

    The answer to 100 - 8 should not be four twenties and a twelve. We’re counting, not making change.

    French counting is bunk. Way, Way, better then Denmark though apparently

    • Nariom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      the thing nobody mentions is that the 4x20 part became a word that just means 80 in people’s mind, it kinda not literal anymore, but the Swiss and Belgian ways are still better (edit the 4x20+10 is similarly just 90)

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        45 minutes ago

        e a word that just means 80 in people’s mind, it kinda not literal anymore, but the Swiss and Belgian ways are still better (edit the 4x20+10 is s

        And if it was 28 syllables, it would still be 80 in people’s minds. But the words are still four twenty ten eight for what could easily just be nine eight.

        I get it, but it is really inefficient for something as oft used as counting.

        If it makes you feel better, English is full of crap like that which doesn’t make any sense and I’ll own that as a trash language :)

      • vandsjov@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Most Danes does not know how 92 is constructed - it is just as picture one, second calculation: 2 and halvfems = 92.

        However, I do feel like we’re using Imperial unites.