Biden administration officials are laying the groundwork with other Israeli leaders in anticipation of a post-Netanyahu government.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken dialed up pressure on Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday over the future of the Gaza Strip, laying bare the Biden administration’s growing frustrations with the Israeli prime minister’s rejection of a proposal last week.

“There’s a profound opportunity for regionalization in the Middle East, in the greater Middle East that we have not had before,” Blinken said during an interview at the World Economic Forum’s summit in Davos, Switzerland. “The challenge is realizing it.”

Asked if Netanyahu is the prime minister for seizing this opportunity, Blinken said, “These are decisions for Israelis to make,” adding, “This is an inflection point."

Blinken’s comments, made during an interview with New York Times columnist Tom Friedman, come just a week after a trip to the Middle East to try to get Israel and Arab leaders to agree on a path forward for Gaza once the war with Hamas ends.

The Biden administration and Netanyahu’s divisions over Israel’s handling of its war with Hamas, as well as the Israeli leader’s refusal to consider U.S. proposals for a post-war Gaza, have only become more pronounced since Blinken’s visit to Israel, according to multiple senior administration officials.

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    The comments are all so fucking tone deaf, they want Biden to do something yet the more Biden pushes the more upset they become at him for not just stop bibi personally. Get a grip, there’s far more at play here. Ask yourself why Bernie’s latest bill was hot down in such great numbers (of which Biden was not included at all)

    But go ahead and cry that Biden is personally responsible for the genocide Israel has been committing, give me a fuckin break

    • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Directly responsible?

      I don’t know about direct, but he is sure, making sure they don’t run out of ammo.

      So a nice first step would be to, you know, not to do that

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      “Guys guys guys, I cant be responsible for their genocide. All I’ve done is given them weapons and ammo for their genocide while they are in the middle of executing it without even having the common decency to lie and call it something else, and protected their explicitly claimed genocide from international repercussions, but I dont see how I can be at all responsible for it!”