• jaeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t know if this is suppossed to be a meta-commentary/joke or not. I never said both of those things.

      China is more suited for space coordination because of its productive capacity and cooperation with other nations. China will not seek to “own” outer space but to instead integrate space travel as a way to benefit itself and the world. China can care for its citizens, the US is quickly losing the ability/will to do so.

      Why not try to reflect on the fact that the US only cares about space travel when China seems to overtake them ever so slightly?

      I don’t care what you really feel about China, but to interpret my support for China leading the space field as ignorance is just projection.

      • WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        Can we apply this methodology of Chinas in how they treat their neighbors, and “wont seek to “own” outer-space” and do so at the benefit of the world and compare it to how they treat Taiwan, Hong Kong, and international waters? Oh to shreds you say?

        • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Taiwan and Hong Kong were ripped away from China by European colonists, you ignoramus. Hong Kong was occupied as a British colony after the British dominated China during the Opium Wars, you know, that century that started when China decided to ban opium since the Europeans had gotten 60% of the Chinese population addicted and Britain decided to run gun boats through the coast terrorizing and destroying until they sacked the capital, stole and destroyed priceless history, and then forced the Chinese at gun point to re-legalize the drug AND grant ALL Europeans immunity from Chinese law within the 5 major ports?

          Taiwan was the last theater of the Chinese civil war until the British and US navies intervened to protect the KMT and their favored comprador, Chiang Kai Shek. They wanted to ensure another Chinese army could go back and take over from the communists eventually so they protected, funded, and armed the KMT while it prosecuted the White Terror for 40 years, killing hundreds of thousands of political dissidents and indigenous Taiwanese.

          Returning Hong Kong and Taiwan to their integrated status with China is DECOLONIZATION

          • AdeptusPrimaris@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            No, you can’t give context. China bad! /s

            On a serious note, reading a while back about what happened during the opium wars was horrendous. And also finding out that South Korea was governed by murderous fascists until very fairly recently, while the US was supporting the South Korean regime was also an eye opener to me.

            • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              The “governed by murderous fascists until very fairly recently” mirrors Taiwan’s timeline as well.

        • intelshill@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          No one in the region considers the South China Sea to be international waters.

          Everyone just disputes who’s waters they should be. Don’t talk about things you know nothing about.

            • intelshill@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              It’s the same concept where not even Taiwan claims they’re a sovereign and independent state: they’re the rightful government of all of China (including Mongolia).

                  • WraithGear@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    And yet the argument was never “do these places need to be independent?” But “can China be trusted with dominion over space based on how they treat international waters and their neighbors.” You will notice that i did not specify any particular action or event. But you are already here with excuses for events and actions. Hence me mentioning that you are making my argument for me. Because you did that i already know, you know i am right to not trust china, and also you have a vested interest in me not being right.

        • intelshill@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          10 months ago

          Is China shipping billions of dollars in weapons to Israel as they, in 3 months, have dwarfed Ukrainian civilian casualties over 2 years? No? Well…

          Did China instigate a coup of Pakistan’s democratically-elected leader? No?

          Is China the only country voting against the Right to Food pursuant to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 25)? No?

          Hm.

      • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        China will not seek to “own” outer space

        Let’s see China get out of other nations’ ocean space first and then we can talk about outer space.

        • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          10 months ago

          LOL, when was the last time you saw a Chinese ship near Hawaii let alone California? If you want to measure intent by naval presence, you’re just going to make the opposite point you intended